2020
DOI: 10.5771/0038-6073-2020-4-507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DZHW-Promoviertenpanel. Datenbeschreibung, Analysepotential und Zugangswege

Abstract: Das Promoviertenpanel 2014 ist eine bundesweit repräsentative Studie des Deutschen Zentrums für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW) über die Karriereverläufe der Promovierten des Prüfungsjahrgangs 2014. Im Rahmen der Studie wird untersucht, welche Einflüsse die formalen Promotionskontexte und die konkreten Lern- und Entwicklungsbedingungen, die Promovierte während ihrer Promotionsphase vorgefunden haben, auf den beruflichen Übergang nach der Promotion und auf den weiteren Berufsverlauf innerhalb und a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use data from the DZHW Ph.D. Panel 2014 to understand how Ph.D. attainment at 40+ affects integration into the academic labor market through productivity or age discrimination. 7 The panel started in the winter semester of 2013/2014 or the summer semester of 2014 (Brandt et al 2020b;Vietgen et al 2020). From 2015 onward, respondants were surveyed annually about their career development until 2020.…”
Section: Empirical Design a Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use data from the DZHW Ph.D. Panel 2014 to understand how Ph.D. attainment at 40+ affects integration into the academic labor market through productivity or age discrimination. 7 The panel started in the winter semester of 2013/2014 or the summer semester of 2014 (Brandt et al 2020b;Vietgen et al 2020). From 2015 onward, respondants were surveyed annually about their career development until 2020.…”
Section: Empirical Design a Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, identifying ageist mechanisms that divert older PhDs from a sustainable academic career is important.To gain insights into the interacting effects of biological and academic age, we address the following questions: Do PhD graduates with different biological ages differ in the productivity associated with their academic ages? How does biological age relate to transitioning to a tenured position in academia, and what influence does academic age have on tenure?We use data from the DZHW PhD Panel 2014 to understand how PhD attainment at 40+ affects integration into the academic labor market through productivity or age discrimination.7 The panel started in the winter semester of 2013/2014 or the summer semester of 2014(Brandt et al 2020b;Vietgen et al 2020). From 2015 onward, respondents were surveyed annually about their career development until 2020.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%