2012
DOI: 10.1524/9783486716849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-Learning, E-Teaching und E-Assessment in der Hochschullehre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerns are diminishing on the part of the teaching staffs that jobs might be lost and that individual achievements would no longer be transparent in an e-learning scheme. Instead, the staffs have developed more positive attitudes towards experimenting with new possibilities of teaching and learning [15]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns are diminishing on the part of the teaching staffs that jobs might be lost and that individual achievements would no longer be transparent in an e-learning scheme. Instead, the staffs have developed more positive attitudes towards experimenting with new possibilities of teaching and learning [15]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is the pedagogical reasonability of using e-learning resources to meet a set of language teacher training requirements? E-learning resources have been widely used abroad for a quite long time (Fandei, 2011;Handke & Schäfer, 2012;Hofmann, 2011;Hutz, 2008;Keegan, 1996;Pal-Liebscher & Wittan, 2015;Raith, 2009;Raith & Hegelheimer, 2010;Raith & Mueller-Hartman, 2008;Rösler, 2010;Warschauer, 2006); they are https: //doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.09.02.82 Corresponding Author: Marina Scherbakova Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference eISSN: 2357-1330 725 also quite well-known in Russia, however, their role in the educational process, and most importantly, the pace of implementation continues to be rather insignificant. The conducted studies (Dochkin, Michurina, & Tupikina, 2015;Khudoverdova, 2015;Kuklev, 2010;Martynova, 2014;Safonova, 2011;Sevastianova, 2006;Yakovleva, 2007) allow to identify a number of main reasons to explain such situation.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third question concerns the technology of organising the educational process at university with the use of e-learning resources: synchronous / asynchronous learning (Develotte & Mangenot, 2010), modular training (Scherbakova & Chaika, 2015), e-learning (Dochkin et al, 2015;Handke & Schäfer, 2012;Pal-Liebscher & Wittan, 2015;Rösler, 2010), blended learning (Fenenko & Bulgakova, 2016;Hofmann, 2011;Graham, 2004;Tomlinson & Whittaker, 2013). Blended learning allows to combine traditional teaching methods and innovative technologies; therefore, in today's educational environment, this training format is a priority (Garton, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concepts for adult education have been rare thus far. According to Handke and Schäfer, the ICM has spread across various disciplines, particularly in the United States [ 32 ]. Some faculties have reorganised curricula entirely to the Inverted Classroom Model [ 33 ], [ 34 ], [ 35 ].…”
Section: Developmental Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%