2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-learning success model for instructors’ satisfactions in perspective of interaction and usability outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H. E. Gay The D&M (2003) model was later updated to evaluate ELS success using webbased applications. The updated model provided useful measures for studying ELS success with online learners but few studies involved online instructors (Tella et al 2010;Wang and Wang 2009;Yengin et al 2011). Studies however focused on validating the model for ELS success (Holsapple and Lee-Post 2006), investigated factors that measured ELS success (Tella et al 2010), and studied the role of learner involvement in ELS success (Klobas and McGill 2010).…”
Section: Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…H. E. Gay The D&M (2003) model was later updated to evaluate ELS success using webbased applications. The updated model provided useful measures for studying ELS success with online learners but few studies involved online instructors (Tella et al 2010;Wang and Wang 2009;Yengin et al 2011). Studies however focused on validating the model for ELS success (Holsapple and Lee-Post 2006), investigated factors that measured ELS success (Tella et al 2010), and studied the role of learner involvement in ELS success (Klobas and McGill 2010).…”
Section: Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the ELS is a repository for e-learning course content, information quality addresses accuracy and clarity in addition to the various information formats required for fast retrieval (Holsapple and Lee-Post 2006). A poorly designed e-learning course also reduces interaction within the ELS and affects e-learning success (Motaghian et al 2013;Mutala and van Brakel 2006;Yengin et al 2011).…”
Section: Pre-course Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, a significant number of studies have been carried out on performance evaluation in distance education systems in the recent years, indicating the complexity of the evaluation process and the application of relevant findings for decision making. Islas et al suggest that since the nature of distance education system is interdisciplinary, it is important for various specializations to be applied when the learning concept is theorized (12)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although information technologies can theoretically be useful to support the learning process, a careful evaluation of their benefits is needed (Yengin, Karahoca, & Karahoca, 2011;Wu, Tennyson, & Hsia, 2010). In this experiment, we evaluated the RIT system from the functionality and usability perspective.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%