2014
DOI: 10.1504/ijeg.2014.065083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-parliament services as tools for anti-corruption and transparency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of upazilas for this study was random, but their economic and literacy conditions were taken into account. Literacy and educational levels can be a factor in the success of e-governance (Olasina, 2014). The most recent available data show a high percentage of poor people living below the 'upper poverty line' (20.2%) and the 'extreme poor' (36.74% below the 'lower poverty line'), with Chandina being the poorest of the five.…”
Section: Objectives and Methodology Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of upazilas for this study was random, but their economic and literacy conditions were taken into account. Literacy and educational levels can be a factor in the success of e-governance (Olasina, 2014). The most recent available data show a high percentage of poor people living below the 'upper poverty line' (20.2%) and the 'extreme poor' (36.74% below the 'lower poverty line'), with Chandina being the poorest of the five.…”
Section: Objectives and Methodology Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is interesting to note that few studies had a qualitative approach, although qualitative research is important to understand (why) the reasons for some relationships found 28 papers analyzed the acceptance of e-Government services from the citizen's point of view, that is, the intention of a citizen to use or not a certain service related to e-Government. Only 9 studies (Dečman, 2015;Gupta et al, 2008;Hu et al, 2011;Ibrahim & Zakaria, 2016;Mardiana et al, 2015;Mosweu et al, 2016;Olatubosun & Rao, 2012;Olasina, 2014;Olasina & Mutula, 2015) analyzed from the point of view of the civil servant -or of the congressmen, as in the case of the studies by Olasina (2014), and Olasina and Mutula (2015). The remaining papers didn't use any population, as they were purely theoretical articles.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Bibliographic Portfolio (Bp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…India (Chatterjee et al, 2018;Dwivedi et al, 2017;Gupta et al, 2008;Rana et al, 2016;Saxena & Janssen, 2017;Sharma & Mishra, 2017); Indonesia (Andriani et al, 2017;Mardiana et al, 2015;Witarsyah et al, 2017); Iraq (Faaeq et al, 2015;Ibrahim & Zakaria, 2016); Jordan (Alryalat et al, 2012(Alryalat et al, , 2013; Kuwait (AlAwadhi & Morris, 2009); Lebanon (Fakhoury & Aubert, 2015); Nigeria (Amagoh, 2016;Olasina, 2014;Olasina & Mutula, 2015;Olatubosun & Rao, 2012); Pakistan (Ahmad et al, 2013); Portugal (Naranjo-Zolotov et al, 2018); Tunisia (Chaouali et al, 2016).…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Bibliographic Portfolio (Bp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation