2019
DOI: 10.24846/v28i3y201904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EA-Based Design of a Nonlinear PID Controller Using an Error Scaling Technique

Abstract: In controller design, linear PID controllers have something of a dilemma relationship: a fast response requires large gains, which in turn, give rise to a large overshoot. For this reason, a variety of feedback control forms and related tuning methods have been implemented to guarantee satisfactory performance. Recently, multiple studies which introduce nonlinearities into the structure of the standard PID controller have been performed to solve this conflicting relationship. This study proposes an EA-based no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One solution is to deal with two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) fuzzy controllers; the concept of 2-DOF fuzzy control was coined by Precup & Preitl (1999) and Precup & Preitl (2003) as fuzzy control with non-homogenous dynamics with respect to the input channels, and further developed in their later works applied to servo systems and electrical drives (Precup et al, 2009;Preitl et al, 2012). Another solution is to change the optimization problems and algorithms, with useful examples that deal with path planning (Purcaru et al, 2013), fuzzy classification systems (Johanyák, 2017), asymmetric traveling salesman problem (Osaba et al, 2018), benchmark functions (Abed-alguni, 2019), controller tuning (So, 2019), and the application of type-2 fuzzy control (Li et al, 2018;Moreno et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One solution is to deal with two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) fuzzy controllers; the concept of 2-DOF fuzzy control was coined by Precup & Preitl (1999) and Precup & Preitl (2003) as fuzzy control with non-homogenous dynamics with respect to the input channels, and further developed in their later works applied to servo systems and electrical drives (Precup et al, 2009;Preitl et al, 2012). Another solution is to change the optimization problems and algorithms, with useful examples that deal with path planning (Purcaru et al, 2013), fuzzy classification systems (Johanyák, 2017), asymmetric traveling salesman problem (Osaba et al, 2018), benchmark functions (Abed-alguni, 2019), controller tuning (So, 2019), and the application of type-2 fuzzy control (Li et al, 2018;Moreno et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ABS's functionality has been improved by using the well-known PID-based mechanism. The dynamic response of an automobile may be analyzed and improved using a mathematical model developed by [38]. Equilibrium, steering and driving abilities may be improved with a PID controller installed on the vehicle's back wheels.…”
Section: Classical Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gun-Baek [38] used a novel non-linear PID (NPID) controlling technique for a group of vehicle ABS issues to solve this issue. The PID algorithms offer the benefits of reliable control with the simplicity of fine-tuning.…”
Section: Classical Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most industrial processes are stable, overdamped systems with time delay. Therefore, many first-order processes with time delay (FOPTD) with one real pole in the transfer function have been used to design controllers for them [1][2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a PIPTD model, a first-order filter is in series with a parallel PID controller, and the results are as follows in Equation (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%