2015
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earlier Time to Reduction Did Not Reduce Rates of Femoral Head Osteonecrosis in Pediatric Hip Fractures

Abstract: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported incidence of avascular necrosis after femoral neck fractures varies considerably, range from 0 % to 92% in literatures [18,15,5,6,7,8]. The overall rate of osteonecrosis in our study is 10.7%, with type II of 10.5% (2/19 ) and type III 11.1% (1/9), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reported incidence of avascular necrosis after femoral neck fractures varies considerably, range from 0 % to 92% in literatures [18,15,5,6,7,8]. The overall rate of osteonecrosis in our study is 10.7%, with type II of 10.5% (2/19 ) and type III 11.1% (1/9), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…It is usually the result of high-energy injury. Previous studies have reported a high risk of severe complications following a pediatric hip fracture [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. As a result of anatomical differences, the complications observed in pediatric patients with hip fracture tend to different from those in adults, making this specific patient population and proper surgical management essential to characterize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As patients younger than 10 years of age have a greater remodeling capacity, the functional results are better in these patients, and the complication rates are lower [22,23]. However, the age factor is a subject of controversy in the literature [8,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%