2020
DOI: 10.3390/plants9101327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Detection of Airborne Inoculum of Nothopassalora personata in Spore Trap Samples from Peanut Fields Using Quantitative PCR

Abstract: A quantitative PCR (qPCR)-assay was developed to detect airborne inoculum of Nothopassalora personata, causal agent of late leaf spot (LLS) on peanut, collected with a modified impaction spore trap. The qPCR assay was able to consistently detect as few as 10 spores with purified DNA and 25 spores based on crude DNA extraction from rods. In 2019, two spore traps were placed in two peanut fields with a history of LLS. Sampling units were replaced every 2 to 4 days and tested with the developed qPCR assay, while … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The H. zea samples used here were live moths collected from pheromone traps after one or two nights. Three crude extraction methods were evaluated for use on whole moths of H. zea : i) the method of using ‘squish’ buffer (10 mM tris, 0.5 mM EDTA, 12.5 mM NaCl) extraction (Perera et al 2015), ii) the method from Munir et al (2020) using NaOH-based extraction buffer (100 mM NaOH, 2mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) and neutralization buffer (Tris-HCl pH 2), and iii) the commercial crude DNA extraction kit QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution (Epicentre, Madison, WI). Ten H. zea moths were used to test each extraction method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The H. zea samples used here were live moths collected from pheromone traps after one or two nights. Three crude extraction methods were evaluated for use on whole moths of H. zea : i) the method of using ‘squish’ buffer (10 mM tris, 0.5 mM EDTA, 12.5 mM NaCl) extraction (Perera et al 2015), ii) the method from Munir et al (2020) using NaOH-based extraction buffer (100 mM NaOH, 2mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100) and neutralization buffer (Tris-HCl pH 2), and iii) the commercial crude DNA extraction kit QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution (Epicentre, Madison, WI). Ten H. zea moths were used to test each extraction method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the modified method of Munir et al (2020), the microvials containing NaOH-based extraction buffer were placed in boiling water for 5 min. The microvials were then spun at 12,000 g for 5 min before transferring 100 µl of supernatant from each tube into a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube that contained 100 µl of neutralization buffer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this method requires professionals to crack the spores under strict experimental conditions. Only through tedious processing can fungal spores be detected [ 8 , 9 ]. The existing microscopic image method can realize rapid detection and recognition through morphology, but it cannot accurately identify spores with similar shape and size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, therefore, essential to develop efficient, reliable and easy‐to‐use tools for monitoring pathogens directly in the air. A number of methods are available for pathogen monitoring, including airborne spore trapping, which is an effective method for the early detection of outbreaks before symptoms appear on the plot (Munir et al, 2020; Rahman et al, 2017; Thiessen et al, 2016). Such monitoring can improve plant disease forecasting models (Van der Heyden et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%