1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69010232.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Detection of DNA Strand Breaks in the Brain After Transient Focal Ischemia: Implications for the Role of DNA Damage in Apoptosis and Neuronal Cell Death

Abstract: Using in situ DNA polymerase I-mediated biotin-dATP nick-translation (PANT) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl-transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL), we investigated the evolution of DNA strand breaks, a marker of DNA damage, in rat brain after 1 h of middle cerebral artery occlusion and various durations of reperfusion. DNA single-strand breaks (SSB5) detected by PANT were present in neurons after as little as 1 mm of reperfusion. Numbers of neurons containing an SSB increased progressively in the is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
214
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
12
214
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of ss breaks in apoptotic DNA fragments has been clearly demonstrated (Figure 1). 7,51,52 The rate of nuclear proteolysis might also be a factor determining the extent of DNA fragmentation, since rapid protein degradation and collapse of nuclear structure might stop DNA cleavage at any given stage. This would explain the fact that DNA degradation never proceeds to completion and that the DNA ladder is not always observed even in cells containing nucleases capable of internucleosomal DNA cleavage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of ss breaks in apoptotic DNA fragments has been clearly demonstrated (Figure 1). 7,51,52 The rate of nuclear proteolysis might also be a factor determining the extent of DNA fragmentation, since rapid protein degradation and collapse of nuclear structure might stop DNA cleavage at any given stage. This would explain the fact that DNA degradation never proceeds to completion and that the DNA ladder is not always observed even in cells containing nucleases capable of internucleosomal DNA cleavage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slight disparities between TUNEL and SS-DNA labeling at day 14 of EHYP could reflect sensitivity differences between the two methods in the detection of apoptosis. Alternatively, because TUNEL is considered to be a less specific marker of apoptosis (Grasl Kraupp et al, 1995;Frankfurt et al, 1996), other cells in the process of death by nonapoptotic mechanisms may have also been labeled (Chen et al, 1997;Labat Moleur et al, 1998). It needs to be emphasized that the magnitude of tissue hypoxia used in this study was relatively mild compared with the levels of hypoxia required for induction of apoptosis using a single exposure (Banasiak and Haddad, 1998).…”
Section: Apoptosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TUNEL labeling was performed according to a published method (Chen et al, 1997), with minor modifications. In brief, fixed cells in slide chambers were incubated in the terminal deoxynucleotidyl-transferase (TDT) buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 10 minutes at RT and then incubated for 2h at 37°C in TDT buffer containing 10 mM biotin-aha-dUTP (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 300 U/ml TDT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).…”
Section: Terminal Deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated Dutp Nick End mentioning
confidence: 99%