2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762011000500003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early detection of leprosy by examination of household contacts, determination of serum anti-PGL-1 antibodies and consanguinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…leprae [5, 29]. Individuals in close contact with untreated MB patients have a 10% lifetime risk of eventually succumbing to leprosy [2, 9, 29–31], particularly when they are consanguineous relatives [29]. Although a positive titre to anti-PGL-I is an infection biomarker, it is not an absolute indicator of disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…leprae [5, 29]. Individuals in close contact with untreated MB patients have a 10% lifetime risk of eventually succumbing to leprosy [2, 9, 29–31], particularly when they are consanguineous relatives [29]. Although a positive titre to anti-PGL-I is an infection biomarker, it is not an absolute indicator of disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In healthy subjects, a high anti-PGL-I and anti-LID-1 titre suggests that there is a hidden bacillary load driving the response to this antigen. Household contacts demonstrating substantial increases in titre against LID-1 and/or PGL-I should be closely monitored [29, 31]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 In highly endemic areas, distribution of PGL1 positivity in leprosy cases is similar between household contacts and non-household contacts, but there is a significant difference between contacts and non-contacts in areas of low endemicity. 31 However, there is no cutoff point for anti-PGL-1 levels to distinguish between subclinical infection and disease, both in the healthy population and in leprosy patients.…”
Section: Laboratory Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the anti-PGL-I antibody can be detected in saliva and serum and its determination may be useful for the evaluation of antigen exposure and response to MDT and for distinguishing MB from paucibacillary (PB) patients (Bonfitto et al 2009). Another application of the detection of this antibody was studied in the evaluation of household contacts (HHC) of LPs, where we observed that the serum anti-PGL-I IgM antibody may be useful for evaluating antigen exposure and as a tool for an early leprosy diagnosis in HHC (Bazan-Furini et al 2011).…”
Section: Immunopathological Mechanisms In Leprosy -mentioning
confidence: 99%