2018
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early development of vocal interaction rules in a duetting songbird

Abstract: Exchange of vocal signals is an important aspect of animal communication. Although birdsong is the premier model for understanding vocal development, the development of vocal interaction rules in birds and possible parallels to humans have been little studied. Many tropical songbirds engage in complex vocal interactions in the form of duets between mated pairs. In some species, duets show precise temporal coordination and follow rules (duet codes) governing which song type one bird uses to reply to each of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…we have recorded juveniles singing highly developed songs alongside their parents following their duet code, which suggests parents are indeed vocal tutors of their offspring. This has also been documented in superb-fairy wrens, Malurus cyaneus, where fledglings acquire song elements from their mothers and social fathers (Evans and Kleindorfer 2016), and in canebrake wrens, where juveniles improved their temporal coordination and duet code adherence while duetting with their parents over time (Rivera-Cáceres et al 2018). An alternative explanation for the high levels of phrase and duet type sharing documented in this study could be that repertoire sharing allows individuals and pairs to song match or repertoire match in order to escalate or de-escalate aggression during agonistic interactions (Nordby et al 1999, Beecher andBrenowitz 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…we have recorded juveniles singing highly developed songs alongside their parents following their duet code, which suggests parents are indeed vocal tutors of their offspring. This has also been documented in superb-fairy wrens, Malurus cyaneus, where fledglings acquire song elements from their mothers and social fathers (Evans and Kleindorfer 2016), and in canebrake wrens, where juveniles improved their temporal coordination and duet code adherence while duetting with their parents over time (Rivera-Cáceres et al 2018). An alternative explanation for the high levels of phrase and duet type sharing documented in this study could be that repertoire sharing allows individuals and pairs to song match or repertoire match in order to escalate or de-escalate aggression during agonistic interactions (Nordby et al 1999, Beecher andBrenowitz 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Avian duets show a high diversity in complexity and in precision of coordination between the partners’ vocal emissions. While in some bird species vocalizations from both duet partners temporally overlap to a variable degree 2–4 , other birds produce vocal duets in which the partners’ contributions alternate almost perfectly 57 . Growing evidence suggests that alternating vocalizations in avian duets are a direct result of the partners’ effort to avoid signal overlap 2,8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vocal exchange is a phenomenon suitable to analyze the association between the acoustic variation of contact calls and listeners’ responses: it allows the proper identification of listeners (i.e., second callers), and two types of responses, the vocal and the behavioral (e.g., orienting behaviors: [1618]). Among the nonhuman primate species that exchange calls (e.g., Callithrix jacchus : [16]; Macaca fuscata : [17]; Cantorchilus zeledoni : [18]), it is well accepted that spider monkeys ( Ateles geoffroyi ) exchange long-distance contact calls termed “whinnies” [9]. In our previous study, we found that whinnies have a graded acoustic structure, and a high amount of acoustic variation related to the caller’s immediate behavior (e.g., scanning, looking toward the observer) and separation distance between callers [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%