2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2007.03560.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early diagenetic greigite as a recorder of the palaeomagnetic signal in Miocene-Pliocene sedimentary rocks of the Carpathian foredeep (Romania)

Abstract: S U M M A R YDuring the Miocene-Pliocene, the Carpathian region represented the westernmost part of the so-called Eastern Paratethys, a palaeobioprovince that covered central and eastern Europe as well as parts of southwest Asia. Previous palaeomagnetic investigations provide a highresolution magnetochronology for the sedimentary sequences of the Carpathian foredeep and indicate a marked transition in magnetic carriers from iron oxides to iron sulphides, in Chron C3r. Here, we demonstrate using detailed rock m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
9
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FORC diagrams indicate the presence of a highly interacting (pseudo) single domain with an B c peak at ∼60 mT but with a spread up to ∼85 mT ( Figure 2P). This FORC diagram shows many similarities to diagrams obtained from other greigite-bearing rocks of the Paratethys (Vasiliev et al, 2007;Chang et al, 2014). A more pronounced central ridge and less pronounced GRM are observed in comparison to type 2 ( Figure 2Q).…”
Section: Rock Magnetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The FORC diagrams indicate the presence of a highly interacting (pseudo) single domain with an B c peak at ∼60 mT but with a spread up to ∼85 mT ( Figure 2P). This FORC diagram shows many similarities to diagrams obtained from other greigite-bearing rocks of the Paratethys (Vasiliev et al, 2007;Chang et al, 2014). A more pronounced central ridge and less pronounced GRM are observed in comparison to type 2 ( Figure 2Q).…”
Section: Rock Magnetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Type 4 IRM acquisition curves appear to be saturated or nearly saturated at 700 mT, making a fit with a detrital magnetite component similar to types 1-3 unlikely. Therefore, we propose a fit with two IRM components of approximately equal B 1/2 at ∼60-65 mT (Figures 3B,C) implying two overlapping greigite components (see also Vasiliev et al, 2007). FORC diagrams are more noisy for Type 4, which agrees with the lower amounts of greigite ( Figure 3D).…”
Section: Rock Magnetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the primary magnetic mineral assemblage of detrital origin is often overprinted by post-depositional alteration (Hounslow and Maher, 1999;Roberts et al, 1996). The latter results from changing redox conditions at the lake/sea floor and in subsurface sediments leading to dissolution of iron oxides and formation of ferrimagnetic iron sulfides, such as greigite and pyrrhotite (Demory et al, 2005;Froelich et al, 1979;Karlin and Levi, 1983;Rowan et al, 2009;Sagnotti, 2007;Vasiliev et al, 2007) or paramagnetic minerals, such as pyrite, siderite, and vivianite (Dong et al, 2000;Karlin and Levi, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of FORC distributions is typical of diagenetic SD greigitebearing sediments (e.g. Roberts et al, 2011Roberts et al, , 2006Roberts et al, , 2000Rowan and Roberts, 2006;Sagnotti et al, 2010;Vasiliev et al, 2007). Many FORC diagrams have a variable mixture of these two FORC distributions: the central ridge representing one end member and the vertically spread concentric contours the other (Fig.…”
Section: Rock Magnetismmentioning
confidence: 90%