2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00061-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early elevation of S-100B protein in blood after cardiac surgery is not a predictor of ischemic cerebral injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evidence suggests that extracerebral sources may also influence serum S100B (21 ), although usually in a minor way. Moreover, S100B production by the fetus could also be feasibly playing a role in our findings because concentrations of the protein are known to be quite high in cord blood compared with those found in adult serum (22,23 ).…”
Section: Clinical Chemistry 50 No 2 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence suggests that extracerebral sources may also influence serum S100B (21 ), although usually in a minor way. Moreover, S100B production by the fetus could also be feasibly playing a role in our findings because concentrations of the protein are known to be quite high in cord blood compared with those found in adult serum (22,23 ).…”
Section: Clinical Chemistry 50 No 2 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although S100B is the most promising marker, conflicting results for increased serum S100B concentrations after cardiac injury (11,12 ) indicate that the specificity of this protein is limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because all assays for the quantification of S100B are only specific for the b-chain they must detect S100a (a-b) as well as b-b. In our opinion this is an important reason for the increase of S100B during and early after cardiac surgery [2]. The antibody used in our current study (S-2657, Sigma-Aldrich, Seelze, Germany) was tested for cross-reactivity with other calcium-binding molecules of the EF hand type but no positive results could be seen.…”
Section: A Replymentioning
confidence: 89%