2020
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early fate of exogenous promoters in E. coli

Abstract: Gene gain by horizontal gene transfer is a major pathway of genome innovation in bacteria. The current view posits that acquired genes initially need to be silenced and that a bacterial chromatin protein, H-NS, plays a role in this silencing. However, we lack direct observation of the early fate of a horizontally transferred gene to prove this theory. We combine sequencing, flow cytometry and sorting, followed by microscopy to monitor gene expression and its variability after large-scale random insertions of a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solving for N , under steady growth, one obtains and, as a consequence Our strains carried fluorescent reporters for ribosomal and constitutive promoters inserted in the chromosome close to either the origin or the terminus of replication (see methods and ref. [54, 55]), and we used their experimentally measured dynamics to define the putative production rate of the putative “adder protein”. The constitutive reporter “P5” is based on a strong exogenous promoter with consensus −10 and −35 sequences lacking any transcription factor regulation, as well as lacking a GC-rich ppGpp discriminator region at the transcirption initiation site that would render it sensitive to inhibition by ppGpp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solving for N , under steady growth, one obtains and, as a consequence Our strains carried fluorescent reporters for ribosomal and constitutive promoters inserted in the chromosome close to either the origin or the terminus of replication (see methods and ref. [54, 55]), and we used their experimentally measured dynamics to define the putative production rate of the putative “adder protein”. The constitutive reporter “P5” is based on a strong exogenous promoter with consensus −10 and −35 sequences lacking any transcription factor regulation, as well as lacking a GC-rich ppGpp discriminator region at the transcirption initiation site that would render it sensitive to inhibition by ppGpp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our strains had fluorescent reporters for ribosomal and constitutive promoters inserted in the chromosome close to both the origin and the terminus of replication (see methods and ref. [53,54]), and we used their experimentally measured dynamics to define the putative production rate of the putative "adder protein". Following the literature, we agnostically assumed that an effector molecule that is produced at a rate proportional to volume triggers division once a critical amount is reached ("initiator accumulation" hypothesis [1]).…”
Section: Near-adder Behaviour Is Conserved During the Upshiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, H-NS binding sites are apparent as troughs on the transcriptional propensity map (i.e., low transcriptional propensity). Subsequent high-throughput assessment of fluorescent protein expression from transposon integrations largely confirmed these results, and also linked H-NS binding sites to low reporter expression (16). H-NS binds to and reduces expression of genes with AT rich sequences (1720).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…6C ; Pearson’ rho is 0.81 and 0.61 for free-living and bacteroid ChIP-seq data, respectively; P values < 0.01). The importance of cis element variation is supported by a recent study on H-NS, in which with or without binding signals of xenogeneic silencer H-NS can partially explain a wild range of expression variability of a foreign gene that was randomly inserted into genomes of a population of E. coli [ 79 ]. In line with this scenario, a great variation in MucR1 recruitment levels was observed within individual replicons or pangenome subsets of S. fredii (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%