2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.05.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early-infant diagnostic predictors of the neuro-behavioral development after neonatal care

Abstract: Multidimensional diagnosis plays a central role in infant developmental care, which leads to the prediction of future disabilities. Information consolidated from objective and subjective, early and late, central and peripheral data may reveal neuro-pathological mechanisms and realize earlier and more precise preventive intervention. In the current study, we retrospectively searched correlating factors to the following neurological and behavioral development of 'Head Control' and 'Roll Over' using multivariate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panel E illustrates social and cognitive behavioral tests used in preclinical NDD models based on domestic chicks (Koshiba et al, 2013a;Koshiba et al, 2013c; and common marmosets Koshiba et al, 2011;Koshiba et al, 2015b;Koshiba et al, 2013b;Senoo et al, 2011;. Paralleling human clinical studies in preterm infants and juveniles (Koshiba et al, 2015a;Koshiba et al, 2013b; , such models can also enhance biomarker discovery. For example, the posterior-lateral forebrain serotonin metabolite, 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5HIAA), correlates with chick freezing behavior , whereas emotional phenotypes in common marmosets correlate with venous blood progesterone in female adult common marmosets (Koshiba et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Panel E illustrates social and cognitive behavioral tests used in preclinical NDD models based on domestic chicks (Koshiba et al, 2013a;Koshiba et al, 2013c; and common marmosets Koshiba et al, 2011;Koshiba et al, 2015b;Koshiba et al, 2013b;Senoo et al, 2011;. Paralleling human clinical studies in preterm infants and juveniles (Koshiba et al, 2015a;Koshiba et al, 2013b; , such models can also enhance biomarker discovery. For example, the posterior-lateral forebrain serotonin metabolite, 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5HIAA), correlates with chick freezing behavior , whereas emotional phenotypes in common marmosets correlate with venous blood progesterone in female adult common marmosets (Koshiba et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, multivariate analyses of neurological development across age in normal infants vs. infants with aberrant neural development shows correlation of physiological biomarkers (blood and brain imaging data) with specific behavioral phenotypes, such as head control and rolling behavior (Fig. 2F) (Koshiba et al, 2015a). This raises the possibility of using such phenotypes as potential 'early' behavioral biomarkers of NDDs (Koshiba et al, 2015a), crucial in the absence of other, more complex behaviors to aid diagnostics.…”
Section: Making Research More Translational: From Lab To Bedsidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…White matter volume was shown to increase at a higher rate than gray matter volume throughout childhood. Koshiba et al used principal component analysis to examine factors associated with the neurological and behavioral development of “Head Control” and “Roll Over” in a neonatal population (Koshiba et al, 2015 ). They determined that hematological and brain anatomical factors were correlated with these basic neonatal movement patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following our previously published methods (domestic chicks: [ 6 , 21 , 22 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]; common marmosets [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 21 , 33 , 34 ] and humans [ 6 , 21 , 44 , 45 ]), we then used principal component analysis (PCA) to infer the complex developmental mechanisms relating our obtained multiple variables including behavioral, physiological, biomolecular and psychological factors. The light-dark or before-after feeding differences of each principal component (PC) score were additionally analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD, as described above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%