2020
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Introduction of Solid Feeds: Ingestion Level Matters More Than Prebiotic Supplementation for Shaping Gut Microbiota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, when compared with the control, YP treatment increased the abundance of Ruminococcaceae in the cecum. Similarly, Paes et al. (2020) reported significant higher abundance of Ruminococcaceae in rabbit fed with prebiotic supplementation contained MOS when compared with control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Interestingly, when compared with the control, YP treatment increased the abundance of Ruminococcaceae in the cecum. Similarly, Paes et al. (2020) reported significant higher abundance of Ruminococcaceae in rabbit fed with prebiotic supplementation contained MOS when compared with control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There were 79 families present in the chicken caecal ecosystem of which 5 were classified as ‘unknown family’. However, only 13 families had a relative abundance of over 0.5% in at least one experimental group and were further considered for statistical analysis (Paës et al, 2020) (Figure 8a, Table S1). Compared to the Control group, the inoculation significantly halved the relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae on 25 days chickens and doubled that of Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae at 35 days of age while the establishment of the Monoglobaceae family was observed from D31 (Figure 8b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentially abundant caecal bacterial genera 16S RNA gene sequences analyses revealed a total of 206 genera in the chicken caecal ecosystem of which 8 had multi-affiliation and 38 were classified as unknown genus is given a BLAST identity threshold of 97%. Thirty-five identified genera had a relative abundance of over 0.5% in at least one experimental group and were further considered for statistical analysis (Paës et al, 2020) (Figure 9, Table S1). Compared to the control group, the inoculation decreased the Escherichia-Shigella proportion at 25 days of age, those of Rombustia at 25 and 31 days of age, and the Clostridioides proportion at 31 days.…”
Section: Differentially Abundant Caecal Bacterial Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, studies with germ-free animals have provided clear evidence that gut microbiota composition plays an essential role in full intestinal blood vessel development, in promoting development of B and T cells in Peyer's Patches of gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), and in driving production of mucosal Ig (review by Martin et al, 2010). Breakthroughs in high-throughput sequencing technology in recent years have made it possible to investigate the rabbit microbiota composition throughout the digestive tract (Massip et al, 2012;Bäuerl et al, 2014;Zhu et al, 2015;Arrazuria et al, 2016;Combes et al, 2017;Crowley et al, 2017;Arrazuria et al, 2018;Jin et al, 2018;Velasco-Galilea et al, 2018;Mattioli et al, 2019;North et al, 2019;Read et al, 2019;Beaumont et al, 2020;Paës et al, 2020;Cotozzolo et al, 2021). In accordance with the different functions in each section of the digestive tract, microbial community composition is different.…”
Section: Microbiomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, in the distal segment of the digestive tract (sacculus rotundus, caecum and vermiform appendix), Firmicutes doubles its presence (~76%), whereas Bacteroidetes (~12%), Proteobacteria (~2%) and Actinobacteria (~1%) are reduced (see Table 6). Bibliography has reported that factors such as age, sex, food composition and texture, feed intake levels and drinking water temperature can remodel the composition of the gut microbiota (Combes et al, 2013(Combes et al, , 2017Zhu et al, 2015;Jin et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2018;Mattioli et al, 2019;North et al, 2019;Read et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019a;Beaumont et al, 2020;Paës et al, 2020;Cotozzolo et al, 2021).…”
Section: Microbiomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%