2018
DOI: 10.1038/nature25444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Middle Palaeolithic culture in India around 385–172 ka reframes Out of Africa models

Abstract: Luminescence dating at the stratified prehistoric site of Attirampakkam, India, has shown that processes signifying the end of the Acheulian culture and the emergence of a Middle Palaeolithic culture occurred at 385 ± 64 thousand years ago (ka), much earlier than conventionally presumed for South Asia. The Middle Palaeolithic continued at Attirampakkam until 172 ± 41 ka. Chronologies of Middle Palaeolithic technologies in regions distant from Africa and Europe are crucial for testing theories about the origins… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sankalia 1964;Blinkhorn et al 2015). The Attirampakam assemblages (N5, N4, N3) are unique amongst Middle Pleistocene assemblages from South Asia with the reported presence of retouched points (Akhilesh et al 2018). Retouched points are reported from multiple Middle Palaeolithic assemblages, including Chamu, Jwalapuram 22 (Fig.…”
Section: Standardised Point Productionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sankalia 1964;Blinkhorn et al 2015). The Attirampakam assemblages (N5, N4, N3) are unique amongst Middle Pleistocene assemblages from South Asia with the reported presence of retouched points (Akhilesh et al 2018). Retouched points are reported from multiple Middle Palaeolithic assemblages, including Chamu, Jwalapuram 22 (Fig.…”
Section: Standardised Point Productionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The earliest Middle Palaeolithic (or Middle Stone Age) assemblage in the world has been reported from Attirampakam, South-East India, dating to~385 ka (Akhilesh et al 2018), although significant chronological breaks occur in the sequence and before these industries are found anywhere else in South Asia. Middle Palaeolithic industries appear repeatedly in the second half of MIS 5, from 96 ka (Blinkhorn et al 2013, marking a 30-ka gap from the youngest well-dated Late Acheulean industries (see .…”
Section: Cultural Evolution In South Asiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability to impose bilateral symmetry underlies an increase in hierarchical complexity and higher cognitive abilities (Stout, ; Toth & Schick, ). Following technological types (like Middle Paleolithic tools, described in the archeological record after 385 ka; Scott & Ashton, ; Akhilesh et al, ) are generally made from retouched flakes or through prepared core technology (Levallois tools), and are particularly related with late Homo heidelibergensis , early Neanderthal, and archaic forms of H. sapiens (Toth & Schick, ). In this study, tool sample included 20 experimental lithic tools, belonging to different Lower Paleolithic morphotypes (choppers, handaxes, and flakes; see Table for length, width, thickness, and weight descriptive statistics).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human remains found outside Africa go back at least to 175 kya in Israel (Hershkovitz et al 2018) and to 120 kya in China (Liu et al 2015). Stone tools found in India have been dated at 300 kya (Akhilesh et al 2018). The discoveries are seemingly never ending, so it's hard to get a clear picture of a new understanding of how humans got to be everywhere.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and The Problematic Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%