2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2004.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early post-impact sedimentation around the central high of the Mjølnir impact crater (Barents Sea, Late Jurassic)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsunamites have been documented in deep water sedimentary sequences from the Middle (Brookfield et al. 2006) and Late Jurassic (Dypvik et al. 2004) and some coarse‐grained sediments of the ‘Purbeckian’ facies in northern France (Deconnick et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsunamites have been documented in deep water sedimentary sequences from the Middle (Brookfield et al. 2006) and Late Jurassic (Dypvik et al. 2004) and some coarse‐grained sediments of the ‘Purbeckian’ facies in northern France (Deconnick et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coincidence of the Morokweng and Mjølnir HVI craters with the end-Jurassic boundary is noteworthy. The two craters were not synchronous, as high-resolution stratigraphic evidence shows that the Mjølnir HVI occurred after the end-Jurassic boundary (Smelror et al 2001;Dypvik et al 2004), but the conservative error assigned to the age (Gradstein et al 2005) overlaps with the end of the Jurassic.…”
Section: Hvi Crater Ages and Their Relationship With Stratigraphic Bomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the impact is known to be younger than the target rock from which the crater formed, but older than the crater-filling sediments. Sometimes this technique can yield tight age constraints (Smelrør et al 2001;Dypvik et al 2004), but other HVI craters have only a maximum age constraint from the target rock. Crater counting and overlap, which provides strong constraints for crater ages on other bodies such as the Moon and Mars Neukum et al 2001), does not work on the Earth with its constantly reworked surface, and only two craters on Earth can be dated relative to one another.…”
Section: Use Of Radiometric Dating To Determine the Ages Of Hvismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the most commonly reported liquefaction trigger is undoubtedly earthquake shaking (Seilacher, 1969;Pratt, 1994;Alfaro et al, 1997;Pope et al, 1997;Rodríguez-Pascua et al, 2000;Obermeier et al, 2002;McLaughlin and Brett, 2004;Bachmann and Aref, 2005;Mazumder et al, 2006;Montenat et al, 2007;Moretti and Ronchi, 2011, among many others). A few studies have linked liquefaction phenomenon even to meteorite impacts (Sturkell and Ormö, 1997;Alvarez et al, 1998;Simms, 2007) or their subaqueous resurge deposits (Poag et al, 1992;Dypvik et al, 2004;Schulte et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%