1983
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(83)90028-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early pregnancy diagnosis in sows by ultrasonic linear electronic scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This method of gestagen measurement can be performed in most clinics and laboratories, and is considered to have a high clinical applicability for pregnancy diagnosis in the sow. The reported accuracies of other main methods of pregnancy diagnosis for the sow are: 81.3-85.2% for the rectal examination method at 20 days after mating [1,3,10,19], 94.0-97.0% for the vaginal mucosal tissue examination at 20 days after mating [7,30], 58.0-80.0% at 22 days after mating and 91.9-100% at 40-50 days after mating for the ultrasonic Doppler method [48], 96.0-100% for the ultrasonic echo method at 30-90 days after mating [23], and 100% for the ultrasonography at more than 22 days after mating [15,16]. Also, for endocrinological methods, the reported accuracies are: 90.3% at 26-30 days after mating for the urine estrogen measurement method [5], 88.0-96.4% at 16-24 days after mating for the blood progesterone measurement method [9,36,38], and 93.7-98.0% at 24-32 days after mating for the blood estrone sulphate measurement method [8,43,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of gestagen measurement can be performed in most clinics and laboratories, and is considered to have a high clinical applicability for pregnancy diagnosis in the sow. The reported accuracies of other main methods of pregnancy diagnosis for the sow are: 81.3-85.2% for the rectal examination method at 20 days after mating [1,3,10,19], 94.0-97.0% for the vaginal mucosal tissue examination at 20 days after mating [7,30], 58.0-80.0% at 22 days after mating and 91.9-100% at 40-50 days after mating for the ultrasonic Doppler method [48], 96.0-100% for the ultrasonic echo method at 30-90 days after mating [23], and 100% for the ultrasonography at more than 22 days after mating [15,16]. Also, for endocrinological methods, the reported accuracies are: 90.3% at 26-30 days after mating for the urine estrogen measurement method [5], 88.0-96.4% at 16-24 days after mating for the blood progesterone measurement method [9,36,38], and 93.7-98.0% at 24-32 days after mating for the blood estrone sulphate measurement method [8,43,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported accuracies of the other main methods of pregnancy diagnosis for sow are: 81.3-85.2% for the rectal examination method at 20 days after mating [1][2][3][4]; 94.0-97.0% for the vaginal mucosal tissue examination method at 20 days after mating [5,6]; 58.0-80.0% at 22 days after mating and 91.9-100% at 40-50 days after mating for the ultrasonic Doppler method [7]; 96.0-100% for the ultrasonic echo method at 30-90 days after mating [8]; and 100% for the ultrasonography at more than 22 days after mating [9,10]. Tamamura et al [17] reported 93.3% accuracy for the endocrinological method of pregnancy diagnosis at 22-27 days after mating, based on measurements of blood estrone sulphate using EIA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or efficient livestock breeding, pregnancy diagnosis as soon as possible after mating is method [5,6], ultrasonic Doppler method [7], ultrasonic echo method [8], ultrasonography [9,10], urine estrogen measurement method [11], blood progesterone measurement method [12][13][14], and blood estrone sulphate measurement method [15][16][17]. However, all of these methods have problems in terms of simplicity, cost, and accuracy, and are not used widely in the clinical field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clinical applications of ultrasonography in sows has not been popular, and there have been only a few reports of ultrasonography use to detect early pregnancy [14] and uterine disease [15,16] in the sow. There have been even fewer reports of using ultrasonography for detailed observation of the porcine ovarian structure [17], and there have been no reports on the limitations of used for the experiments.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%