2021
DOI: 10.5152/turkthoracj.2021.20158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Prone Positioning and Non-Invasive Ventilation in a Critical COVID-19 Subset. A Single Centre Experience in Southern Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical discomfort with the prone position was the primary factor in participant compliance, which is similar to other studies. 21,26,27 Previous publications noted limitations in maintaining the prone position 15,17,22 ; however, in this study, researchers identified specific contributing factors not previously identified such as room layout and various interruptions. The findings of this study offer additional information regarding barriers to awake self-proning in the acute care setting and considerations when implementing this intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physical discomfort with the prone position was the primary factor in participant compliance, which is similar to other studies. 21,26,27 Previous publications noted limitations in maintaining the prone position 15,17,22 ; however, in this study, researchers identified specific contributing factors not previously identified such as room layout and various interruptions. The findings of this study offer additional information regarding barriers to awake self-proning in the acute care setting and considerations when implementing this intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Similar to our study, adverse events such as catheter dislodgement and pressure injuries were not reported in other studies, 16,17 and some found improvement in rates of intubation and mortality. [21][22][23] Conversely, Padrão et al 24 found the prone positioning had no impact on the intubation rates in their participants. Although this was not a comparative study with a control group, we examined ICU utilization of participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 25 A recent study has demonstrated the substantial efficacy of the prone position. 26 In our study, awake prone was used in 96% of patients, and prone ventilation was used in all patients on mechanical ventilation except in patients with morbid obesity, acute stroke, thrombosis of limbs, and pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Tiga penelitian melakukan perubahan posisi (diselingi posisi lain) pada masingmasing 2, 4, dan 12 jam (Kharat et al, 2021;Paternoster et al, 2020;Simioli et al, 2021). Perubahan posisi dilakukan untuk mencegah luka tekan dan nyeri sendi (Simioli et al, 2021). Hal ini sesuai dengan panduan dari ICS bahwa posisi pasien harus diubah setiap 0,5-2 jam atau lebih jika memungkinkan.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified