Early‐Stage Comparative Sustainability Assessment of New Bio‐based Processes

Abstract

Our increasing demand for materials and energy has put critical roadblocks on our path towards a sustainable society. To remove these roadblocks, it is important to engage in smart research and development (R&D). We present an early-stage sustainability assessment framework that is used to analyze eight new bio-based process alternatives developed within the CatchBio research consortium in the Netherlands. This assessment relies on a multi-criteria approach, integrating the performance of chemical conversions based on five indicators into an index value. These indicators encompass economics, environmental impact, hazards and risks thereby incorporating elements of green chemistry principles, and techno-economic and life cycle assessments. The analyzed bio-based options target the production of fuels and chemicals through chemical catalysis. For each bio-based process, two R&D stages (current laboratory and expected future) are assessed against a comparable conventional process. The multi-criteria assessment in combination with the uncertainty and scenario analysis shows that the chemical production processes using biomass as feedstock can provide potential sustainability benefits over conventional alternatives. However, further development is necessary to realize the potential benefits from biomass gasification and pyrolysis processes for fuel production. This early stage assessment is intended as an input for R&D decision making to support optimal allocation and utilization of resources to further develop promising bio-based processes.

Rules and benefits of Life Cycle Assessment in green chemical process and synthesis design: a tutorial review

“…112 The assessment relied on a multi-criteria approach, integrating the performance of chemical conversions based on five indicators into an index value. The indicators encompassed economics, environmental impact, hazards and risks, techno-economics and LCA.…”

Glycidol, a Valuable Substrate for the Synthesis of Monoalkyl Glyceryl Ethers: A Simplified Life Cycle Approach

“…Researchers have compareds ome of the major algorithms proposed for the chemical sector, [29,30] giving ac riticale valuation, which is not exclusively focused on the comparison of material efficiency metrics. [33] In addition, this kind of approachi s usefuli nd ecision making (e.g.,p lant retrofitting) and to verify the bestg reen chemistry &e ngineering principle applicable to the selected case study. In our case, to address process sustainability,w ea ppliedas tandardized approach.I np articular,w ec hose the LCA methodology.I SO 14040 series (EN ISO 14040 and 14044) [31,32] provides the general framework, the rules of application,a nd all the limitations.…”

Lifecycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of biomass‐based 2‐ethylhexanol as an alternative transportation fuel

“…Biomass-based production of 2-EH has been subject to investigations earlier by Patel et al 16 who also assessed the life cycle performance of 2-EH production from ethanol. Biomass-based production of 2-EH has been subject to investigations earlier by Patel et al 16 who also assessed the life cycle performance of 2-EH production from ethanol.…”