2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early Toxicity and Patient Reported Outcomes From a Phase 2 Trial of FDG-PET Response-Based De-Escalated Definitive Radiotherapy for p16+ Oropharynx Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eligibility for radiotherapy deintensification requires at least a 50% reduction in composite MTV at 2 weeks, relative to baseline. Planned interim analysis reported by Allen et al 46 confirmed feasibility and demonstrated a reduction of objective toxicity measures, such as weight loss and Penetration Aspiration Score, in the deintensified cohort, without present evidence of inferior tumor-control outcomes. In another trial utilizing midtreatment PET for identifying patients eligible for radiation deintensification (NCT00606294), patients with no pretreatment or complete resolution of hypoxia, measured using F-MISO after 1 week of CRT, received de-escalated radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fxs in initial cohort, 35,47 then 30 Gy/15 fxs for the expansion cohort 48 ).…”
Section: Observational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Eligibility for radiotherapy deintensification requires at least a 50% reduction in composite MTV at 2 weeks, relative to baseline. Planned interim analysis reported by Allen et al 46 confirmed feasibility and demonstrated a reduction of objective toxicity measures, such as weight loss and Penetration Aspiration Score, in the deintensified cohort, without present evidence of inferior tumor-control outcomes. In another trial utilizing midtreatment PET for identifying patients eligible for radiation deintensification (NCT00606294), patients with no pretreatment or complete resolution of hypoxia, measured using F-MISO after 1 week of CRT, received de-escalated radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fxs in initial cohort, 35,47 then 30 Gy/15 fxs for the expansion cohort 48 ).…”
Section: Observational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The results of several studies are still awaited (NCT03224000, NCT03972072, NCT04242459, and NCT03935672). Mid‐treatment FDG/PET imaging can also be used to select patients for de‐escalated radiotherapy in good prognosis HPV+ OPC, as shown by Allen et al 126 . Finally, facilitation of ART is crucial for the utilization of proton therapy in clinical practice for HNC patients.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…125 The results of several studies are still awaited (NCT03224000, NCT03972072, NCT04242459, and NCT03935672). Mid-treatment FDG/PET imaging can also be used to select patients for de-escalated radiotherapy in good prognosis HPV+ OPC, as shown by Allen et al 126 Finally, facilitation of ART is crucial for the utilization of proton therapy in clinical practice for HNC patients. Proton therapy has been proven a promising treatment for patients with HNC, since it offers the ability to deliver high doses to the TV while minimizing the dose to the adjacent OAR.…”
Section: Adaptation Of Target Volumesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to best tailor definitive therapy is unknown, and likely traditional clinical factors (e.g., smoking status) are insufficient. In fact, early results of several de-escalation strategies suggest that deintensified treatment in patients with a smoking history results in favorable outcomes 19–21 . Circulating tumor DNA kinetics during treatment or at the end of treatment may be a means to determine which patients have a favorable response to therapy and which are at high risk for treatment failure and persistent disease.…”
Section: During Treatment and At Treatment Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%