2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-405x(03)00121-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

211
3,598
15
290

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,345 publications
(4,114 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
211
3,598
15
290
Order By: Relevance
“…368-388, Maio/Jun. 2016 www.anpad.org.br/rac Chen et al, 2010;Leuz, Nanda, & Wysocki, 2003). Nonetheless, our variable of interest (G1) captures all these factors.…”
Section: Regression Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…368-388, Maio/Jun. 2016 www.anpad.org.br/rac Chen et al, 2010;Leuz, Nanda, & Wysocki, 2003). Nonetheless, our variable of interest (G1) captures all these factors.…”
Section: Regression Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Leuz, Nanda and Wysocki (2003), managers can use reporting discretion to misstate their firm's economic performance. They can overstate reported earnings in order to reach a target or report extraordinary performance in specific situations.…”
Section: Measuring Earnings Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leuz et al (2003) analyse the different levels of EM through an international sample of countries and recognise that differences in accounting standards may limit the ability of management manipulation. It is therefore necessary to control for the accounting differences between countries that could potentially limit capacity and enhance the quality of financial statements.…”
Section: Accounting Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main characteristics of each of them can be summarised as follows, from the studies of Mora et al (2004), Leuz et al (2003) and Weimer and Pape (1999): -US model: Instrumentalist conception of the company oriented to shareholders as the main stakeholders and the presence of a strong capital market as well as dispersed ownership, strong investor rights and legal controls. The tendency towards EM is lower, leading to greater FRQ.…”
Section: Accounting Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…supervisory board, audit committee, compensation policy, internal controls); organizational culture; internationalization; size; among others. Previous studies have also identified several exogenous factors that might affect the EM behavior, such as human and economic development, economic freedom (Riahi-Belkaoui, 2004); legal system, including the rules and their enforcement (Leuz, Nanda & Wysocki, 2003); cultural values (Han, Kang, Salter, & Yoo, 2010) and; audit quality (Tendeloo & Vanstraelen, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%