2020
DOI: 10.1108/jaar-01-2019-0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earnings management to avoid earnings boosts

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate whether earnings boosts before the year end trigger earnings management. It examines whether firms that substantially outperformed their last year earnings during the first three quarters push their earnings down to avoid reporting earnings boosts.Design/methodology/approachRegression analysis is used to compare earnings management of firms with earnings boosts and other firms.FindingsThe results indicate that firms outperforming their last year results by the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, to ensure that our results are due to revenue misclassification, we control for AEM, REM and expense shifting in the model (3). Following prior studies (for instance, Makarem and Roberts, 2020; Zang, 2012), we measure REM through abnormal discretionary expenditure ( A_DISX ) and abnormal production costs ( A_PROD ). Following prior studies (for instance, Bansal and Ali, 2021; Bansal and Kumar, 2021), we measure AEM through abnormal accruals ( A_ACC ), where A_ACC is estimated through the performance-adjusted modified Jones model (Kothari et al , 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, to ensure that our results are due to revenue misclassification, we control for AEM, REM and expense shifting in the model (3). Following prior studies (for instance, Makarem and Roberts, 2020; Zang, 2012), we measure REM through abnormal discretionary expenditure ( A_DISX ) and abnormal production costs ( A_PROD ). Following prior studies (for instance, Bansal and Ali, 2021; Bansal and Kumar, 2021), we measure AEM through abnormal accruals ( A_ACC ), where A_ACC is estimated through the performance-adjusted modified Jones model (Kothari et al , 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We end our sample period in 2018 as there is evidence that Brexit uncertainty started to decline after 2018 (Bloom et al 2019a, b). Consistent with prior earnings management studies (e.g., Roychowdhury 2006;Xu 2016;Makarem and Roberts 2020), we exclude firms operating in regulated industries (SIC codes 4400-4999), and banks and financial institutions (SIC codes 6000-6499). Measures of earnings manipulation are run cross-sectionally for every year and industry.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chanchani and MacGregor (1999) reviewed the literature that examined Gray's postulations and found consistent support for a direct relationship between aspects of accounting and uncertainty avoidance. More recently, both Nabar and Boonlert-U-Thai (2007) and Doupnik (2008) found that uncertainty avoidance is significantly related to earnings management; Makarem and Roberts (2020) and Makarem et al (2018) emphasize that earnings management is a critical subject in accounting. Daniel et al (2012), using GLOBE variables, found a positive relationship between uncertainty avoidance and corporate governance practices.…”
Section: Operationalization Of Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%