2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake losses due to ground failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
131
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
131
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Bird and Bommer (2004) reported a small contribution of secondary events to the total losses (except for megaearthquakes, such as Indonesia 2004 and Japan 2011, which were not in the present study).…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Indeed, Bird and Bommer (2004) reported a small contribution of secondary events to the total losses (except for megaearthquakes, such as Indonesia 2004 and Japan 2011, which were not in the present study).…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…12 differs significantly from Bird and Bommer (2004) and is closer to Marano et al (2010). As demonstrated by Bird and Bommer (2004) 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 found that only 75 % of these social losses and approx. 85 % of the economic losses were due to shaking; however, a much lower amount is due to building collapse.…”
Section: The Secondary Effects Of Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Landsliding is a significant secondary earthquake hazard that can account for up to 25 % of earthquake fatalities in mountainous regions (Yin et al, 2009;Budimir et al, 2014). In addition, the collateral damage and disruption caused by landslides substantially inhibit short-and medium-term relief efforts by blocking or destroying transport corridors and communications (Bird and Bommer, 2004;Pellicani et al, 2014;Robinson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Mapping Landslides After Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the collateral damage and disruption caused by landslides substantially inhibit short-and medium-term relief efforts by blocking or destroying transport corridors and communications (Bird and Bommer, 2004;Pellicani et al, 2014;Robinson et al, 2015). The assessment of landslide extent and impacts, beyond direct observations on the ground (Collins and Jibson, 2015;Tiwari et al, 2017), relies on the following three approaches: (1) empirical modeling, which uses a combination of pre-earthquake topographic data and information on ground motion and shaking intensity; (2) manual landslide mapping; and (3) automated landslide mapping.…”
Section: Mapping Landslides After Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%