Earthquake‐related water‐level changes at 16 closely clustered wells in Tono, central Japan

Abstract

Abstract. Water-level/pressure data recorded at a dense network of 16 wells of depths ranging from 23 to 201 rn within 400 rn of the Tono Mine in Gifu prefecture, central Japan, have been studied in search of possible earthquake-related changes. The study area is traversed by the east-west trending Tsukiyoshi fault, which is ordinarily impermeable, sustaining a significantly higher groundwater pressure on the north side of the fault than the south side. On March 16, 1997, a local earthquake of magnitude 5.8 occurred about 50 km south of Tono. The related water-level/pressure changes recorded at different sites showed different features. At three deeper wells on the north side of the fault the water level and pressure showed large coseismic drops (up to 29 cm) followed by larger rises (of as much as 1.8 m). Two days before the earthquake the water level at another deeper well began to show a total drop of about 3 rn during the next 2 months. Most of the shallow wells on the north side of the fault showed water-level drops after the earthquake. On the south side, however, only a small delayed surge and a subsequent gradual increase were recorded at a deeper well. Long-term data since 1989 at one of the deeper wells on the north side showed coseismic drops and recoveries for 25 moderate local and large distant earthquakes up to about 1000 km away. The different observed earthquake-related waterlevel/pressure changes cannot be explained by the static strain field calculated on the basis of poroelastic dislocation models; the changes require earthquake-related permeability changes at the monitoring sites. The high sensitivity of some of the water wells to seismic shaking may be due to the near-critical condition of the tapped aquifer/barrier system beginning several years prior to the March 16 earthquake, such that the local seismic shaking caused by each of the above mentioned earthquakes was sufficient to produce some quickly recoverable fissures in the system, resulting in the observed water-level changes. The sensitivity appears to be variable, showing an apparent decrease during a 1-year period after the earthquake. IntroductionEarthquake-related water-level and chemistry changes, other than those induced by seismic oscillations, have been reported for many earthquakes [King, 1986;Roelofts, 1988Roelofts, , 1998]. Such changes, especially those observed at unexpectedly large epicentral distances (about 1000 km), are not well understood on the basis of currently used poroelastic earthquakesource and precursor models. Consequently, the validity of the relationship between the earthquakes and groundwater changes, particularly pre-earthquake changes, has been questioned [Roelofts, 1988]. Recent studies suggest, however, that some of these changes might be caused by local permeability changes at the monitoring sites that are not accounted for in the theoretical models [Rojstaczer and Wolf, 1992; King et al., 1994].In the present paper we show a unique set of water-level/ pressure data, which were continuously and reli...

Effects of mechanical layering on hydrofracture emplacement and fluid transport in reservoirs

“…For groundwater, for example, the effects of fault slip during earthquakes include changes in yield of springs, water table, and stream flow (Roeloffs, 1988;Muirwood and King, 1993;Rojstaczer et al, 1995;King et al, 1999;Grecksch et al, 1999). Similar effects occur in hydrothermal systems.…”

Hydrologic Responses to Earthquakes and a General Metric

“…As noted by many authors (e.g., Mogi et al 1989;Roeloffs 1998;King et al 1999;Manga & Wang 2007;Wang & Chia 2008), the distribution of a variety of hydrologic responses may be scaled by the earthquake magnitude M and distance r from the earthquake source. These parameters, i.e., r and M, are used to characterize the occurrences of hydrologic responses because the majority of Fig.…”

Technical NoteEarthquake dates and water level changes in wells in the Eskisehir region, Turkey

“…The importance of hydrogeological data is a reality accepted by earthquake prediction scientists (King et al, 1999;Koizumi et al, 1996;Arabelos et al, 2001). However, in addition to hydrological data, seismic net, deformation net (tiltmeter, extensiometer, dilatometer, and GPS measurements), field excursions, paleo-seismologic and micro zoning activities, electromagnetic net, acoustic wave emissions and geophysical studies are all required.…”