2018
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jey172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echo-derived peak cardiac power output-to-left ventricular mass with cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts outcome in patients with heart failure and depressed systolic function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data collected at each stage, that is at baseline, after 4 min, at the AT, and at peak effort, included: left ventricle (LV) and atrial (LA) volumes, stroke volume (SV), peak E-wave and A-wave velocities, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-derived S’ and e’ at the septal and lateral mitral annulus, tricuspid regurgitation velocity and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE); LV volumes and LVEF were calculated from the apical two- and four-chamber views using the modified Simpson’s rule. SV was calculated by multiplying the LV outflow tract area at rest by the LV outflow tract velocity–time integral measured by pulsed-wave Doppler during each activity level, as previously validated [ 20 23 ]. Cardiac output was calculated as the multiplication of SV and HR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collected at each stage, that is at baseline, after 4 min, at the AT, and at peak effort, included: left ventricle (LV) and atrial (LA) volumes, stroke volume (SV), peak E-wave and A-wave velocities, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-derived S’ and e’ at the septal and lateral mitral annulus, tricuspid regurgitation velocity and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE); LV volumes and LVEF were calculated from the apical two- and four-chamber views using the modified Simpson’s rule. SV was calculated by multiplying the LV outflow tract area at rest by the LV outflow tract velocity–time integral measured by pulsed-wave Doppler during each activity level, as previously validated [ 20 23 ]. Cardiac output was calculated as the multiplication of SV and HR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac power is a comprehensive quantitative indicator and can evaluate cardiac function via noninvasive echocardiography [4,5,19]. It is better than variables such as cardiac output because it covers both pressure load and volume load [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is better than variables such as cardiac output because it covers both pressure load and volume load [20]. Since the power depends on the volume of the muscle that produces the power, standardizing cardiac power with LV mass can better evaluate the applicability of this indicator in different populations [4,6,19], and also facilitate the comparison between individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the exercise stress echocardiography-derived peak CPO to mass may contribute to the evaluation of functional status in patients with HF. 16 Although these estimations by echocardiography are safe, rapid, and non-invasive, the estimation of stroke volume depends on the accurate assessment of the LV outflow tract, so obtaining consistent values between institutions and observers is challenging. The cardiopulmonary exercise test also has been used to calculate peak CO and stratify patients with chronic HF.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%