2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13224-011-0084-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiographic Assessment of Cardiovascular Hemodynamics in Preeclampsia

Abstract: Women with preeclampsia have significant systolic and diastolic dysfunction compared to normotensive controls. Blood pressure monitoring alone is insufficient to identify effectively, risk of cardiovascular complications in these subjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
25
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
25
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cardiac output in pre-eclamptics was 6600.85 ± 4.56 ml/ min as compared to 5600.1 ± 1.77 ml/min which was significantly higher. Our results were comparable to the study done by Solanki et al [4] in which they assessed the echocardiographic changes in pre-eclamptic women. Women with pre-eclampsia had higher aortic root diameter as compared to normotensive control (2.48 vs. 2.02 cm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Cardiac output in pre-eclamptics was 6600.85 ± 4.56 ml/ min as compared to 5600.1 ± 1.77 ml/min which was significantly higher. Our results were comparable to the study done by Solanki et al [4] in which they assessed the echocardiographic changes in pre-eclamptic women. Women with pre-eclampsia had higher aortic root diameter as compared to normotensive control (2.48 vs. 2.02 cm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Solanki et al [4] did a similar study to evaluate various systolic parameters in pre-eclamptics and normotensive women, and they found a statistically significant difference in mean SV between two groups studied. Stroke volume in women with pre-eclampsia and normotensives was 73.3 ± 14.19 versus 70.8 ± 3.22 ml, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations