1992
DOI: 10.1258/002367792780740512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiographic parameters and indices in the normal Beagle dog

Abstract: Summary M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements were made from the right sternal border of 50 healthy Beagles (25 males and 25 females) approximately 7 months old. The dogs were conscious and standing during the investigation.The following parameters, in systole and diastole, were measured on the echocardiographic images: left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVWT); intraventricular septum thickness (1ST); left ventricular internal dimension (LVID); and circumference (LVC). Fractional sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
55
0
13

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
11
55
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…13,27,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] Comparing the ratios of the smallest breed, the Miniature Poodle, with the ratios of the giant breed dogs shows that there is almost an 8-fold difference in LVID d : BW and a 3-fold difference in LVID d : BSA, but the ratio of LVID d to the cube root of BW is nearly constant. Morrison et al, 1992 13 Stepien et al, 1998 18 Crippa et al,, 1992 39 Crippa et al,, 1992 39 Hanton et al, 1998 40 Hanton et al, 1998 40 Hanton et al, 1998 40 Hanton Morrison et al, 1992 13 Koch et al, 1996 45 Morrison et al, 1992 13 Bayón et al, 1994 29 Baade et al, 2002 48 BSA, body surface area; BW, body weight; LVID d , left ventricular end diastolic diameter. Despite the consistency between the predictions produced by this model and published breed-specific reference ranges, we have noted that LVID d never exceeded 6.0 cm and LVID s never exceeded 4.3 cm in any dog in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,27,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] Comparing the ratios of the smallest breed, the Miniature Poodle, with the ratios of the giant breed dogs shows that there is almost an 8-fold difference in LVID d : BW and a 3-fold difference in LVID d : BSA, but the ratio of LVID d to the cube root of BW is nearly constant. Morrison et al, 1992 13 Stepien et al, 1998 18 Crippa et al,, 1992 39 Crippa et al,, 1992 39 Hanton et al, 1998 40 Hanton et al, 1998 40 Hanton et al, 1998 40 Hanton Morrison et al, 1992 13 Koch et al, 1996 45 Morrison et al, 1992 13 Bayón et al, 1994 29 Baade et al, 2002 48 BSA, body surface area; BW, body weight; LVID d , left ventricular end diastolic diameter. Despite the consistency between the predictions produced by this model and published breed-specific reference ranges, we have noted that LVID d never exceeded 6.0 cm and LVID s never exceeded 4.3 cm in any dog in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apenas a PVEd apresentou diferença significativa entre machos e fêmeas, semelhante ao observado por Crippa et al (1992). As demais variáveis não apresentaram diferença entre os sexos.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A fração de ejeção (FEj) é outro índice funcional muito utilizado na rotina ecocardiográfica, porém sua ampla faixa de variação torna seu uso limitado (Crippa et al, 1992). Cães de grande porte geralmente apresentam valores mais baixos que animais de raças pequenas (Snyder et al, 1995;Koch et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Em relação à fração de ejeção, os valores registrados nesse estudo encontram-se dentro do intervalo fisiológico (40 a 100%) (Crippa et al, 1992), não sendo registradas diferenças significativas entre grupos e momentos. Ao estudar pacientes humanos que receberam infusão de propofol e oxigênio a 40% através de máscara, Bilotta et al (2001) não observaram diferenças significativas na FEJ, resultado esse similar ao observado neste estudo.…”
Section: Paraunclassified