2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2017.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eclogite xenoliths from Orapa: Ocean crust recycling, mantle metasomatism and carbon cycling at the western Zimbabwe craton margin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the resetting temperature and pressure cluster around a mantle geotherm associated with surface heat flow of 45 mW/m 2 , appropriate for ambient conditions at the time of the kimberlite eruption, so they may indicate that the xenolith was incorporated at the time of eruption (Litasov et al, 2003). On the other hand, the measured remanent inclusion pressures definitely exclude the possibility that the studied mantle eclogite xenoliths are the product of direct high-pressure magma crystallization at mantle depths, as already supported by geochemical evidence for other xenoliths (Griffin and O'Reilly, 2007;Aulbach et al, 2017). Direct crystallization at depth would result in either coesite inclusions, or inclusions whose remanent pressures would indicate entrapment within the stability field of quartz.…”
Section: Eclogite Xenoliths: Magmatic or Metamorphic?supporting
confidence: 65%
“…We note that the resetting temperature and pressure cluster around a mantle geotherm associated with surface heat flow of 45 mW/m 2 , appropriate for ambient conditions at the time of the kimberlite eruption, so they may indicate that the xenolith was incorporated at the time of eruption (Litasov et al, 2003). On the other hand, the measured remanent inclusion pressures definitely exclude the possibility that the studied mantle eclogite xenoliths are the product of direct high-pressure magma crystallization at mantle depths, as already supported by geochemical evidence for other xenoliths (Griffin and O'Reilly, 2007;Aulbach et al, 2017). Direct crystallization at depth would result in either coesite inclusions, or inclusions whose remanent pressures would indicate entrapment within the stability field of quartz.…”
Section: Eclogite Xenoliths: Magmatic or Metamorphic?supporting
confidence: 65%
“…A websteritic inclusion suite was first recognized in diamonds from the Orapa kimberlite (Gurney et al 1984) and documents the presence of an unusually wide spectrum of "mafic" diamond substrates in the local lithospheric mantle. This is also evident from the compositions of a large suite of eclogite and pyroxenite xenoliths from the Orapa (Aulbach et al 2017). In Karowe, the presence of orthopyroxene-bearing (websteritic) substrates is evidenced by a single enstatite inclusion with low Mg# (57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Mineralogical variability in the eclogitic substrates is also highlighted by the occasional presence of kyanite and coesite inclusions. Kyanite occurs in Group I diamondiferous eclogites from Orapa (Shee and Gurney 1979) and was recently described in Group II diamond-free eclogites by Aulbach et al (2017). It is a characteristic phase of aluminous eclogites in general (Spetsius 2004;Shu et al2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since δ 18 O in garnet from unenriched eclogites from the northern Slave, Lace, and Koidu kimberlites are largely within the canonical mantle range, they cannot be used to assess the effect of mantle metasomatism. There is, however, some evidence that this has occurred in the sample suite from Orapa, where mantle‐like δ 18 O is associated with radiogenic Sr ascribed to overprint by a small‐volume melt derived from an aged lithospheric mantle metasome (Aulbach et al, 2017). Figure 3a shows that UM carbonated melt metasomatism is accompanied by an increase in Cr 2 O 3 , suggested to reflect stealth addition of Cr 2 O 3 ‐rich pyroxene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Slave craton, interaction with a UM carbonated melt produced extremely diamond‐rich high‐Mg eclogites or pyroxenites (Smart et al, 2009), and it has been suggested based on experimental observations that both monocrystalline and fibrous lithospheric diamonds form by redox reactions from carbonated fluids or melts (Bureau et al, 2018). Conversely, in mantle eclogites from Orapa and Koidu, the diamond‐destructive nature of UM carbonated melt metasomatism is indicated by the association of diamond with high‐Ca and low‐Mg eclogites, but absence in LREE‐enriched high‐Mg eclogites and pyroxenites (Aulbach, Jacob, et al, 2017; Aulbach, Woodland, et al, 2019). Indeed, it has been shown experimentally that interaction with oxidizing small‐volume carbonated silicate melts, such as kimberlite, eventually causes diamond resorption and associated carbon remobilization at mantle depth (Fedortchouk et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%