Eco-innovation, sustainable business performance and market turbulence moderation in emerging economies

How do green knowledge management and green technology innovation impact corporate environmental performance? Understanding the role of green knowledge acquisition

“…For this reason, manufacturers are increasingly concerned about developing new, more effective GKM strategies that can enhance their green technology innovation (GTI) capabilities (Belhadi et al, 2020; J. Wang et al, 2020). GTI now represents a crucial strategic accelerator for achieving CEP goals (Larbi‐Siaw et al, 2022) and includes all forms of technological innovation (of products and processes) designed to conserve energy, regulate emissions, and recycle waste, among other eco‐purposes (Shahzad et al, 2020; Singh & El‐Kassar, 2019). The increasing deployment of GTI has led many researchers to emphasize the need to identify key enablers that can facilitate such operations as a possible direction of investigation (Kraus et al, 2020; Rehman et al, 2021; Singh et al, 2020).…”

Eco-innovation influence on business performance in Jordanian micro, small and medium enterprises operating in the food processing sector

“…According to a study, each of the three eco-innovation categories–eco-process, eco-product, and eco-organization–has a direct bearing on the various aspects of sustainable business performance. Absent the moderation of market turbulence in Ghanaian manufacturing firms, the empirical research findings support the positive effects of eco-product, eco-process, and eco-organization on environmental performance and the positive impact of eco-organization on social performance [ 42 ].…”

Transition to a sustainable food supply chain during disruptions: A study on the Brazilian food companies in the Covid-19 era

“…Sustainable performance is usually described using the Triple bottom line (TBL) structure, which considers social, environmental, and economic aspects of sustainability ( Kinnunen et al, 2022 ). In this study, sustainable performance is defined as a reflective construct for the following reasons: (1) most researchers generally define and measure sustainable performance in a reflective way ( Antwi et al, 2022 ; Barbosa et al, 2022 ; Foo et al, 2018 ; Kumar and Rahman, 2016 ; Larbi-Siaw et al, 2022 ); (2) in spite of its extensive representation in three dimensions, sustainable performance has also been defined using other dimensions, such as innovation and operational would form the construct; (3) these dimensions have some overlapping that prevents them to be assessed in isolation.…”