2017
DOI: 10.4236/nr.2017.82005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Characteristics of Two Closely Related Rodent Species in Urban Environment—Permanent Inhabitant vs Newcomer

Abstract: The aim of the study was to characterize natural and urban populations of two Apodemus species-the striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius) and the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis)-seeking to verify whether the different durations of synurbization have led populations of the two species to exhibit differing characteristics. The study was conducted in central Poland (in Warsaw and its surrounds, in urban parks in the city center and in natural habitats outside the city) over two seasons, during which a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the distribution of this species in Slovakia, it did not occur in the diet of the Barn Owl in an intensively used farmland (Veselovský et al 2017). The Striped Field Mouse prefers fields, meadows, wastelands and it is also found in different forests, woodlots patches, in urban and suburban mosaic habitats (Andrzejewski et al 1978, Gliwicz 1980, Liro & Szacki 1987, Kozakiewicz et al 1999, Łopucki et al 2013, Pieniążek et al 2017 and it is well adapted to heterogeneous agricultural landscapes (Gentili et al 2014). Its frequency of occurrence is associated with landscape complexity .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the distribution of this species in Slovakia, it did not occur in the diet of the Barn Owl in an intensively used farmland (Veselovský et al 2017). The Striped Field Mouse prefers fields, meadows, wastelands and it is also found in different forests, woodlots patches, in urban and suburban mosaic habitats (Andrzejewski et al 1978, Gliwicz 1980, Liro & Szacki 1987, Kozakiewicz et al 1999, Łopucki et al 2013, Pieniążek et al 2017 and it is well adapted to heterogeneous agricultural landscapes (Gentili et al 2014). Its frequency of occurrence is associated with landscape complexity .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the urban environment is being evaluated in terms of anthropogenic disturbance, including that to small mammals [4,8,10,11,16,[20][21][22]27,50], these groups are not being extensively studied in farmsteads, homesteads, and kitchen gardens [5,9,14,15,26]. It must be recognized that the homestead environment is subjected to unpredictable and unseasonal changes, resulting in fluctuating resources [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homesteads and kitchen gardens are in the middle of the urban-rural-natural gradient [19][20][21][22]. Under urbanization, natural habitats are transformed or changed, forcing mammals into synurbization [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned earlier, the activation of the HPA axis, which manifests itself in elevated corticosterone levels, affects behavior, allowing the animal to find an optimal reaction to a stressor. it cannot be said that they form a stable urban population [34]. It is also clear that sensitivity to stress factors may change when an animal is frequently exposed to such stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%