2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00498-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological effects and management aspects of an exotic tree species: the case of lodgepole pine in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among those environmental factors, light obstruction by tree canopy has been shown to be the main driving factor in most northern forest ecosystems [9,17,21,32]. All those authors recognise that more open canopy (less shade) leads to both increased ground vegetation biomass and diversity.…”
Section: Why Does the Ground Vegetation Biomass Change?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those environmental factors, light obstruction by tree canopy has been shown to be the main driving factor in most northern forest ecosystems [9,17,21,32]. All those authors recognise that more open canopy (less shade) leads to both increased ground vegetation biomass and diversity.…”
Section: Why Does the Ground Vegetation Biomass Change?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of intensive forestry may also affect other valuable functions of the forest ) and involve trade-offs with ecological sustainability (Colombo et al 2012). Environmental risks associated with the introduction of exotic trees include self-dispersal of the species to new environments, the spread of pathogens and pests to native systems and ecosystems and changes to ecosystem processes, structures, and biodiversity (Engelmark et al 2001). The risks of clone cultivation include susceptibility to fungi or insect attacks (Bishir and Roberds 1999) and decreased biodiversity (Carnus et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A predicted timber shortage led to the largescale introduction of the North-American Lodgepole pine in the 1970s. However, environmental concerns and problems with pathogens and tree instability led to increased restrictions and in 2001, approximately 3 % of the productive forest land was covered in Lodgepole pines (Engelmark et al 2001). One study from 1989 suggest that such forest stands might be perceived as less natural than stands of indigenous tree species, but not less suitable for recreation (Kardell and Wallsten 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the last 20 years, scientific understanding of the ecological risks associated with the long-term use of nonnative trees has grown significantly in response to the perceived negative effects of non-native trees on native ecosystems (Engelmark et al 2000, Karlman 2001, Leege and Murphy 2001, Peterken 2001, Webb et al 2001. When nonnative trees are introduced into novel habitats they can affect the ecosystem by altering native populations through inhibiting germination, establishing new hybrid plants followed by introgression, or reducing growth rates of the native species due to their high susceptibility to disease and pests (Anderson 1949, Henry and Barnes 1977, Engelmark et al 2000, Leege and Murphy 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When nonnative trees are introduced into novel habitats they can affect the ecosystem by altering native populations through inhibiting germination, establishing new hybrid plants followed by introgression, or reducing growth rates of the native species due to their high susceptibility to disease and pests (Anderson 1949, Henry and Barnes 1977, Engelmark et al 2000, Leege and Murphy 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%