“…In fact, using different terms with the root"gypso-"itwouldbepossibletoestablish thedegreeofgypsophily.Startingwiththehighest gypsum preference, there would be those species considered as "gypsophiles" (Table 1), followedby"gypsoclines"(termusedin7%of therevisedpapers;e.g. Meyer,1986;Meyer& al.,1992;Mota&al.,2009;Drohan&Merkler, 2009;Escudero & al., 2015;Robins & al., 2014),followedby"gypsicolous" (Mota&al., 2004(Mota&al., , 2010, "gypsovags" (Meyer, 1986;Escudero & al., 1997;Cerrillo & al., 2002;Ferriol &al.,2006;Palacio&al.,2007;Romão &Escudero,2005),andfinally"gypsophobes" (2%, Meyer,1986;Escudero &al.,2014).The same scale could be used considering other termssuchas:"true","obligate","strict","genuine"or"full"gypsophiles(e.g. Oyonarte &al., 2002;Drohan&Merkler,2009),"preferential", "near" or "sub-gypsophiles" (Meyer, 1986;Cerrillo&al.,2002),"facultative"or"generalist"gypsophiles (Oyonarte&al.,2002;Moore & Jansen, 2007), "waif" or "accidental" gypsophiles (Meyer,1986;Mota&al.,2009)and "non-gypsophiles" (Northington,1976;Mota& al.,2003;Table1).Theterm"gypsophile"can also be found along with other adjectives, althoughnottoindicatethedegreeofgypsophily in a plant species, but other characteristics like its distribution"narrow", "local", "endemic","wide"or"insular"(e.g.…”