2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-006-0039-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological germination requirements of the aggregate species Teucrium pumilum (Labiatae) endemic to Spain

Abstract: Teucrium pumilum L., T. lepicephalum Pau, T. libanitis Schreber, T. turredanum Losa & Rivas Goday, and T. carolipaui Vicioso ex Pau (Labiatae) constitute an aggregate included in the Pumilum subsection (Polium section). These species are endemic and geographically restricted to central and south-eastern Spain. They grow under different climatic conditions and have different edaphic requirements, particularly the gypsum and lime affinities. The effects of some ecological factors (i.e. edaphic and climatic facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These specific indexes were chosen as they are the most suitable for local differentiations within the Mediterranean climate type (Ferriol et al 2006).…”
Section: Climatic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These specific indexes were chosen as they are the most suitable for local differentiations within the Mediterranean climate type (Ferriol et al 2006).…”
Section: Climatic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For E. krendlii especially, the seeds used for experimentation were collected from wild individuals in full fruiting (siliquae valves were clearly opened). Although it has been reported that seeds should be harvested before fully ripe (because they will not grow and will usually die when dehydrated), some species represent exceptions to this rule as their immature seeds germinate quickly and efficiently [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Germination tests were performed in plastic Petri dishes (8.5 cm in diameter) lined with two filter papers and moistened with 3 ml distilled water [21]. The criterion of germination was the visible radicle or cotyledon protrusion [22][23][24][25][26]; this was measured daily under stereoscope in semi-darkness for 6 weeks in E. naxense and 5 weeks in E. krendlii, respectively. For both species, the accumulative germination percentages at the end of each week were corrected for seed viability according to the following formula [27]: Viability Adjusted Germination (VAG) percentages which exceeded the value of 100% were fixed to 100%.…”
Section: Seed Germination Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Itisfrequenttofindthatinthosepapersin which "gypsophile" is used as a noun , other adjectivesareusedaswelltoexpressthe"gypsum-lover" quality (e.g. Lowrey & al., 1994;Ferriol &al.,2006;Moore&al.,2007;Nesom & al., 2007;Martínez-Duro & al., 2012;Aguirre-Liguori & al., 2014;Dehshiri & Jozipoor, 2014;Porras-Alfaro & al., 2014). Amongthem,"gypsophilous"isthemostused (37%), followed distantly by "gypsophilic" (12%)and"gypsicolous"(2%).Infact,outof22 times that "gypsophyte" and "gypsophile" are used in the same paper, only in tree (Hadjikyriakou & Hand, 2011;Queiroz & al., 2012;Dehshiri & Jozipoor, 2014) there is no Spanishcoauthorpresent.Intwoofthepapers (Escudero &al.,1999;Matesanz&al.,2009), "gypsophyte"and"gypsophile"areusedindistinctlyasnouns.Intwoadditionalones,despite thefactthatinthetexttheterm"gypsophiles"is usedexclusively,itisalsopossibletofind"gypsophytes"amongthekeywords (Palacio&al., 2007;Bolukbasi&al.,2016).OnlyQueiroz& al.(2012considerthat"gypsophytes"isageneralconceptthatcanbesubdividedintwocategories:"gypsophiles"and"gypsovags".…”
Section: Gypsophytes Gypsophiles and Related Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, using different terms with the root"gypso-"itwouldbepossibletoestablish thedegreeofgypsophily.Startingwiththehighest gypsum preference, there would be those species considered as "gypsophiles" (Table 1), followedby"gypsoclines"(termusedin7%of therevisedpapers;e.g. Meyer,1986;Meyer& al.,1992;Mota&al.,2009;Drohan&Merkler, 2009;Escudero & al., 2015;Robins & al., 2014),followedby"gypsicolous" (Mota&al., 2004(Mota&al., , 2010, "gypsovags" (Meyer, 1986;Escudero & al., 1997;Cerrillo & al., 2002;Ferriol &al.,2006;Palacio&al.,2007;Romão &Escudero,2005),andfinally"gypsophobes" (2%, Meyer,1986;Escudero &al.,2014).The same scale could be used considering other termssuchas:"true","obligate","strict","genuine"or"full"gypsophiles(e.g. Oyonarte &al., 2002;Drohan&Merkler,2009),"preferential", "near" or "sub-gypsophiles" (Meyer, 1986;Cerrillo&al.,2002),"facultative"or"generalist"gypsophiles (Oyonarte&al.,2002;Moore & Jansen, 2007), "waif" or "accidental" gypsophiles (Meyer,1986;Mota&al.,2009)and "non-gypsophiles" (Northington,1976;Mota& al.,2003;Table1).Theterm"gypsophile"can also be found along with other adjectives, althoughnottoindicatethedegreeofgypsophily in a plant species, but other characteristics like its distribution"narrow", "local", "endemic","wide"or"insular"(e.g.…”
Section: Gypsophytes Gypsophiles and Related Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%