1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1988.tb01486.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Studies on Reovirus Pollution of Rivers in Toyama Prefecture

Abstract: Reoviruses (reos)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, reoviruses remained present at a mean concentration of 1,550 infectious units liter Ϫ1 , compared to 100 infectious units liter Ϫ1 for enteroviruses, in chlorinated secondary wastewater treatment plant effluents (8). In another study, the authors concluded that while animals (swine, cattle, and field mice) may have contributed to reovirus contamination of the watersheds examined, human waste was probably a more significant source of contamination (13). While watershed management practices are different for watersheds polluted by animal sources and watersheds polluted by human sources, both types of waste may contain other pathogens, such as Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmo- Ϫ2 to 10 Ϫ8 dilutions (in duplicate), respectively, of purified RNA of the reovirus type 1 stock; lane 15, no-template control; lanes M, 2,000-to 50-bp DNA molecular weight marker XIII.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one study, reoviruses remained present at a mean concentration of 1,550 infectious units liter Ϫ1 , compared to 100 infectious units liter Ϫ1 for enteroviruses, in chlorinated secondary wastewater treatment plant effluents (8). In another study, the authors concluded that while animals (swine, cattle, and field mice) may have contributed to reovirus contamination of the watersheds examined, human waste was probably a more significant source of contamination (13). While watershed management practices are different for watersheds polluted by animal sources and watersheds polluted by human sources, both types of waste may contain other pathogens, such as Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmo- Ϫ2 to 10 Ϫ8 dilutions (in duplicate), respectively, of purified RNA of the reovirus type 1 stock; lane 15, no-template control; lanes M, 2,000-to 50-bp DNA molecular weight marker XIII.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another 2-year study showed that reoviruses were the most abundant type of viruses isolated from raw river water; 207 of 445 (46.5%) of the strains of viruses isolated were identified as reoviruses (12). Reoviruses kept in agricultural water streams have been shown to survive for 6 months (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We predicted that the genetic analysis of poliovirus isolated from environmental waters might be a useful way of elucidating this. The viruses isolated from the environmental waters, namely, river water and sewage, correlated well with those excreted by inhabitants (13,14,15). Tambini et al have reported that it is important to study the ecology of polioviruses excreted from human intestines into the environment at the final stage of the polio eradication program (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reovirus has been found to be more frequently isolated in samples drawn from estuary water [17]. However, several studies have reported no isolation of reovirus from oysters when investigating the occurrence of enteric viruses [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%