1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00110.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecomorphological individual variation in a population of Haplochromis nyererei from the Tanzanian part of Lake Victoria

Abstract: Intraspecific morphological variation among a population of Haplochromis nyererei (Teleostei, Cichlidae) from Lake Victoria was investigated. Three main groups of variables were used: general shape, outline of the head, and trophic group (intestinal length, stomach contents, teeth and jaw shape, lower jaw length and width). Fishes were arranged into four groups: G1, large males with a prominent bump on the head, a thickset body and anatomical structures related to a strictly insectivorous diet; G2, large males… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies focusing on individual specialization have relied on gut contents as a source of diet information (Bryan & Larkin 1972; Roughgarden 1974; Robinson et al. 1993; Schindler 1997; Fermon & Cibert 1998; Warburton, Retif & Hume 1998; Svanbäck & Bolnick 2007). However, gut contents are a ‘snapshot’ of an individual's diet and do not necessarily reflect long‐term preferences (Warburton et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies focusing on individual specialization have relied on gut contents as a source of diet information (Bryan & Larkin 1972; Roughgarden 1974; Robinson et al. 1993; Schindler 1997; Fermon & Cibert 1998; Warburton, Retif & Hume 1998; Svanbäck & Bolnick 2007). However, gut contents are a ‘snapshot’ of an individual's diet and do not necessarily reflect long‐term preferences (Warburton et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most compelling examples come from studies on fishes, in which researchers repeatedly sampled stomachs of the same individuals and observed high temporal consistency of individual diets (e.g., Bryan and Larkin 1972;Schindler 1997). Other studies showed that morphological variation among consumers explained some of the variation in stomach contents (Fermon and Cibert 1998;Robinson et al 1993;Svanback and Bolnick manuscript). Such morphology-diet correlations are strong evidence that some of the stomach content variation represents consistent diet variation among foragers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many studies focusing on individual specialization have relied on gut contents as a source of diet information (Bryan and Larkin 1972;Fermon and Cibert 1998;Robinson et al 1993;Roughgarden 1974;Schindler 1997;Warburton et al 1998;Svanback and Bolnick manuscript). An important underlying assumption in these studies is that the prey found in the stomach actually represents the longterm resource use of individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While many of the Lake Victoria haplochromine species have been classified based mainly on coloration of mature males, little effort has been put on establishing the shape differences between the species, so that quantifiable differences in shape are not known to date. This study is one of the first to apply GM on Lake Victoria cichlids (but see, Fermon and Cibert 1998). We selected the relatively simple species community of a satellite of Lake Victoria – Lake Kanyaboli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%