“…Traditionally, the endogeneity of network formation received rather limited attention and treatment in studies that rely mostly on restrictions on the structure of interactions and uses of control variables, including fixed effects, with an identification underlined by Bramoullé et al's (2009) results, such as Bifulco et al (2011);Calvó-Armengol et al (2009); Patacchini and Zenou (2016); DeGiorgi et al (2010). A different strand of the literature takes a structural approach that explicitly models the formation of network based on assumptions on individuals' interactions and expectations, and derives identification conditions from the model, including recent developments such as Mele (2017); Badev (forthcoming); Goldsmith- Pinkham and Imbens (2013), as reviewed by De Paula (2017Paula ( , 2020, Graham (2015), and Graham and De Paula (2020). 5 Different from those approaches, ours relies on a source of variation that draws its exogeneity and validity from design, not modeling assumptions, and then uses a relatively simple and transparent IV strategy to identify the LATE.…”