2020
DOI: 10.1007/s41669-020-00199-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Burden of the Out-of-Pocket Expenses for People with Multiple Sclerosis in France

Abstract: Background People with chronic diseases in France frequently incur out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) related to their medical care. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate OOPE incurred by people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with respect to direct non-medical and medical expenditure. Methods Data were collected through a web-based survey using an online patient community platform (Carenity). The survey questionnaire contained 87 questions (numerical response or Likert scale) and took less than 30 min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated OOPE is substantial given that French MS patients receive full healthcare coverage (ALD). Although the total annual OOPE incurred per MS patient was lower in the present study than in the Heinzlef et al study (€1500 vs €893.4), 29 it highlights that OOPEs are still daunting and that MS patients in France continue to incur high OOPEs for healthcare services/items not covered by health insurance.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The estimated OOPE is substantial given that French MS patients receive full healthcare coverage (ALD). Although the total annual OOPE incurred per MS patient was lower in the present study than in the Heinzlef et al study (€1500 vs €893.4), 29 it highlights that OOPEs are still daunting and that MS patients in France continue to incur high OOPEs for healthcare services/items not covered by health insurance.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The studies that described the early retirement prevalence were performed in 25 countries: The United States of America (19, 28.3%) [ 14 , 31 , 36 , 37 , 129 132 , 136 , 140 , 143 146 , 150 , 151 , 160 , 167 , 168 ] Germany (five, 7.5%) [ 97 , 99 , 100 , 102 , 103 ] United Kingdom (five, 7.5%) [ 29 , 32 , 120 , 122 , 123 ], Denmark (four, 6.0%) [ 73 76 ], Australia (three, 4.5%) [ 108 , 109 , 175 ], Belgium (three, 4.5%) [ 35 , 79 , 80 ], Holland (three, 4.5%) [ 61 , 63 , 176 ], Italy (three, 4.5%) [ 111 113 ], Ireland (two, 3.0%) [ 47 , 48 ], Spain (two, 3.0%) [ 8 , 28 ], Sweden (two, 3.0%) [ 90 , 91 ], Switzerland (two, 3.0%) [ 66 , 67 ], Argentina (one, 1.5%) [ 46 ], Austria (one, 1.5%) [ 39 ], Brazil (one, 1.5%) [ 55 ], the Czech Republic (one, 1.5%) [ 40 ], France (one, 1.5%) [ 85 ], Greece (one, 1.5%...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our study disregards the cost of informal care (which is high in MS [31]), productivity loss, and out-of-pocket drugs costs (which exists despite MS is fully covered by NHI [18]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of healthcare expenditures for long-term diseases' management (LTD), such as MS, are 100% reimbursed by the NHI [17]. Most of the remaining medical fees (out-of-pocket expenses) [18] are covered by an optional private health insurance or eligible for state funded free complementary health care [CMUc (Couverture Médicale Universelle complémentaire)] (provided that annual income is below 50% of the poverty threshold) [19].…”
Section: Study Design and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%