2012
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00295-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Consequences of Remittances. Case of Moldova

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result implied that remittances could increase the imports (for durable products from outside) as well as make a deficit in the trade balance. Stratan and Chistruga (2012) had concluded that the remittance inflows in Moldova might explain the international reserves accumulation as well as put this economy under-appreciation. After that, the domestic economic competitiveness has been weakened and constraining national exports (decreased exports competitiveness).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result implied that remittances could increase the imports (for durable products from outside) as well as make a deficit in the trade balance. Stratan and Chistruga (2012) had concluded that the remittance inflows in Moldova might explain the international reserves accumulation as well as put this economy under-appreciation. After that, the domestic economic competitiveness has been weakened and constraining national exports (decreased exports competitiveness).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the modern economy, migration is a unique phenomenon that contributes to the economic development of host countries (Stratan and Chistruga, ). Labour mobility is considered a powerful feature of economic growth and convergence worldwide (Rahmouni and Debbiche, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and Serbia. Records from Romania (a female from Tulcea, 1895, J. J. Mann leg., cMAV, and a female listed by Calefariu 2017) and Moldova (Stratan and Andreev 2015) could not be examined, or not to the extent necessary to allow an unambiguous assignment to this species ( T. pubescens ? ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%