2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Evaluation of Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 AMD is the leading cause of blindness in Shanghai, and anti-VEGF agents have been widely introduced for the treatment of patients with neovascular retinopathy after bevacizumab was proven effective in reducing macular edema in central retinal vein occlusions and inhibiting CNV in 2006. Li et al 36 reported that ranibizumab for neovascular AMD patients gained similar QALY at significantly higher costs in comparison with bevacizumab in China. Patients on ranibizumab treatment obtained 0.007 QALY more than patients on bevacizumab treatment, while the average total cost was CNY 794,400 higher.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 AMD is the leading cause of blindness in Shanghai, and anti-VEGF agents have been widely introduced for the treatment of patients with neovascular retinopathy after bevacizumab was proven effective in reducing macular edema in central retinal vein occlusions and inhibiting CNV in 2006. Li et al 36 reported that ranibizumab for neovascular AMD patients gained similar QALY at significantly higher costs in comparison with bevacizumab in China. Patients on ranibizumab treatment obtained 0.007 QALY more than patients on bevacizumab treatment, while the average total cost was CNY 794,400 higher.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%