2000
DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200017010-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Evaluation of Specific Immunotherapy Versus Symptomatic Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis in Germany

Abstract: This evaluation showed that SIT for 3 years is economically advantageous in patients who are allergic to pollen or mites and whose symptoms are inadequately controlled by continuous symptomatic treatment. After 10 years, the administration of SIT leads to net savings from the perspectives of society, the healthcare system and SHI (third-party payer) in Germany.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The economic evaluation of specific immunotherapy vs symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis was modelized in Germany and France (1146,1680) and it was found to be cost effective due to the long-term effects of immunotherapy.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic evaluation of specific immunotherapy vs symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis was modelized in Germany and France (1146,1680) and it was found to be cost effective due to the long-term effects of immunotherapy.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several health economics studies that include cost-effectiveness and cost-utility calculations have demonstrated that SCIT and SLIT are economically advantageous to pharmacotherapy. [209][210][211][212] Seven studies based on RCT data conducted from a health system perspective and using QALYS as their outcome measure suggests that SLIT and SCIT would be considered cost-effective in this patient population in United Kingdom at the standard National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000 (€24 616) per QALY. [213][214][215][216][217][218][219] The studies comparing SCIT and SLIT have given mixed results and do not allow us to conclude whether either treatment is more cost-effective.…”
Section: Pharmacoeconomic Aspe Cts Of Ait Versus Pharmacothe Rapy Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacoeconomic models based on data provided by clinical trials and meta-analyses indicate that SIT is cost-efficient (146). One of the few real patient cohort studies to investigate cost-effectiveness of SCIT was performed in US children with allergic rhinitis; patients in the SCIT group incurred 33% lower healthcare costs (147,148).…”
Section: Health Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%