Economic Evaluation of Telerobotic Ultrasound Technology to Remotely Provide Ultrasound Services in Rural and Remote Communities

Abstract

Introduction Telerobotic ultrasound technology allows radiologists and sonographers to remotely provide ultrasound services in underserved areas. This study aimed to compare costs associated with using telerobotic ultrasound to provide ultrasound services in rural and remote communities to costs associated with alternate models. Methods A cost‐minimization approach was used to compare four ultrasound service delivery models: telerobotic ultrasound (Model 1), telerobotic ultrasound and an itinerant sonographer (Model 2), itinerant sonographer without telerobotic ultrasound (Model 3), and travel to another community for all exams (Model 4). In Models 1–3, travel was assumed when exams could not be successfully performed telerobotically or by an itinerant sonographer. A publicly funded healthcare payer perspective was used for the reference case and a societal perspective was used for a secondary non‐reference case. Costs were based on the literature and experience using telerobotic ultrasound in Saskatchewan, Canada. Costs were expressed in 2020 Canadian dollars. Results Average cost per ultrasound exam was $342, $323, $368, and $478 for Models 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, from a publicly funded healthcare payer perspective, and $461, $355, $447, and $849, respectively, from a societal perspective. In one‐way sensitivity analyses, Model 2 was the lowest cost from a payer perspective for communities with population >2075 people, distance >350 km from the nearest ultrasound facility, or >47% of the population eligible for publicly funded medical transportation. Conclusion Health systems may wish to consider solutions such as telerobotic ultrasound and itinerant sonographers to reduce healthcare costs and improve access to ultrasound in rural and remote communities.

5G-Based Telerobotic Ultrasound System Improves Access to Breast Examination in Rural and Remote Areas: A Prospective and Two-Scenario Study

“…Considering the need for the corollary equipment and an on-site assistant, the examination cost of the 5G-based telerobotic US system is higher than that of the conventional US system. However, from a societal perspective, 5G-based telerobotic US examination as a distant diagnosis strategy will result in an overall cost reduction owing to a reduction in the travel-related expenses of the patients [29]. Moreover, the questionnaire survey revealed that most patients from the two scenarios had a high acceptance of the 5G-based telerobotic US system and were willing to pay an additional examination fee.…”

Comparison of telerobotic and conventional ultrasonography in children: a crossover bicentric pilot study

“…However, this requires the establishment of agreements between hospitals that might not be easily adopted in every healthcare system. A recent economic evaluation of Canadian adults compared US service delivery models: the cost of telerobotic US was significantly reduced as compared with travelling to another community for all examinations ( 20 ).…”

MSK-TIM: A Telerobotic Ultrasound System for Assessing the Musculoskeletal System

“…They have been shown to help both doctors and patients by improving working conditions and surgical outcomes [1,2]. One area of recent growth, especially with the recent pandemic, is the use of telemedicine [3]. Telemedicine is the practice of medicine, such as doctor's appointments and assessments, over remote distances and often through phone or video conferences.…”