2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic impact assessment of foot-and-mouth disease burden and control in pastoral local dairy cattle production systems in Northern Nigeria: A cross-sectional survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FMD results in economic losses due to decreased production of cattle in endemic regions and trade restrictions on disease-affected countries imposed by disease-free countries [ 3 , 4 ]. FMD outbreaks have been reported on several continents, including Europe, Africa, South America, and Asia [ 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. FMD is endemic in several countries in Asia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMD results in economic losses due to decreased production of cattle in endemic regions and trade restrictions on disease-affected countries imposed by disease-free countries [ 3 , 4 ]. FMD outbreaks have been reported on several continents, including Europe, Africa, South America, and Asia [ 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. FMD is endemic in several countries in Asia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its low mortality compared to some other livestock diseases, FMD is not considered to be of the highest priority by Nigeria's competent authorities. Nevertheless, a recent study shows the high impact of FMD on the pastoral local dairy production system and on the food security and livelihood of the affected communities (8). There is no systematic surveillance for FMD in Nigeria and no control program, and only sporadic FMD notifications are made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies evaluated the profitability of vaccination (n = 4) and antimicrobial treatment (n = 1) in controlling FMD in cattle. In all cases, the results showed that the investments in these interventions would yield high economic returns [46,73,74,81,107]. However, antimicrobial treatment of FMD lesions yielded higher economic returns (BCR = 33.6) compared to vaccination (BCR = 5.5 on average; range 1.9 to 11.5, IRR = 0.8).…”
Section: Foot-and-mouth Diseasementioning
confidence: 98%