2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1096-7508(01)00071-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic impact of a ban on the use of over the counter antibiotics in U.S. swine rations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biodegradation of erythromycin in sediment systems was observed as increased 14 CO 2 evolution in non-autoclaved sediment-containing systems. The PWS and PWS+M treatments displayed higher mineralization rates compared to PW and APWS treatments due to microorganisms present in the sediment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biodegradation of erythromycin in sediment systems was observed as increased 14 CO 2 evolution in non-autoclaved sediment-containing systems. The PWS and PWS+M treatments displayed higher mineralization rates compared to PW and APWS treatments due to microorganisms present in the sediment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One environmental entry point of antibiotics is through land application of manure (7,12,13). Antibiotics are administered to livestock and poultry for treatment of infections as well as for disease prevention, growth promotion, and feed efficiency (14,15). The majority of the antibiotics administered to agricultural animals are excreted as parent compound, due to low absorption rates (16,17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research has been done to date on the cost of AGP removal in the swine industry as well as its impact on prices at the consumer level. Some studies focus on aggregate supply and demand impacts (e.g., Brorsen, Lehenbauer, Dasheng, & Connor, 2002;Wade & Barkley, 1992) whereas others have focused on farm level impacts (Hayes & Jensen, 2003;Hayes, Jensen, Backstrom, & Fabiosa, 2001;Miller, Liu, McNamara, & Bush, 2003). Hayes and Jensen (2003) and Hayes et al (2001) extrapolate U.S. farm level impacts of a partial or full ban from European pre-and postban data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies focus on aggregate supply and demand impacts (e.g., Brorsen, Lehenbauer, Dasheng, & Connor, 2002;Wade & Barkley, 1992) whereas others have focused on farm level impacts (Hayes & Jensen, 2003;Hayes, Jensen, Backstrom, & Fabiosa, 2001;Miller, Liu, McNamara, & Bush, 2003). Hayes and Jensen (2003) and Hayes et al (2001) extrapolate U.S. farm level impacts of a partial or full ban from European pre-and postban data. Using data from the Danish transition to AGP-free production, Hayes and Jensen (2003) estimate that U.S. production cost would increase by an average of $4.50 per hog in the first year of a ban and concede that the number may vary widely across farms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public concerns surrounding the antibiotic resistance issue led to the elimination of prophylactic antibiotic use in animal agriculture in Denmark (20,34). This cessation of the use of prophylactic antibiotics in pig production caused increases in the rate of PWD and a 30% increase in piglet mortality (34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%