2016
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1199430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic impact of onabotulinumtoxinA for overactive bladder with urinary incontinence in Europe

Abstract: In three of five countries investigated, the use of onabotulinumtoxinA, in addition to BSC, was shown to result in healthcare budget cost savings over 5 years. Scenario analyses showed increased costs in Germany and France were largely attributable to the treatment setting rather than onabotulinumtoxinA acquisition costs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also associated with a substantial economic burden in terms of direct cost for the healthcare system, estimated to range from €269 to €702 per patient per year. Ruff et al 24 reported that use of Onab-A resulted in estimated cost savings of €97.200 for 100,000 patients for the Italian health system. The clinical efficacy of Onab-A injections has been widely demonstrated in large, randomised clinical trials for both neurogenic and idiopathic patients with UUI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also associated with a substantial economic burden in terms of direct cost for the healthcare system, estimated to range from €269 to €702 per patient per year. Ruff et al 24 reported that use of Onab-A resulted in estimated cost savings of €97.200 for 100,000 patients for the Italian health system. The clinical efficacy of Onab-A injections has been widely demonstrated in large, randomised clinical trials for both neurogenic and idiopathic patients with UUI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006, a study from the UK demonstrated that BoNT-A injections for overactive bladder irrespective of the pathology were more cost-effective over a 1-year duration than standard care with regular office follow-ups and anticholinergic medication or clean self-intermittent catheterization. This effectiveness was reproduced by other studies from the USA, Europe, and the UK for a 5-year cost-effective and sensitivity analysis comparing BoNT-A injections to conservative management and surgical intervention [6][7][8][9]. All of this economic evidence, coupled with numerous trials demonstrating the effectiveness of botulinum injections for treatment of overactive bladder symptoms and other emerging uses, has popularized its application among urologists and has led to its inclusion as second-and third-line management modality in numerous urology care guidelines reviewed and published by authorities such as the European Association of Urology (EAU), American Urological Association (AUA), and International Continence Society (ICS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%