2018
DOI: 10.1142/s2382624x17500035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Impacts of Irrigation-Constrained Agriculture in the Lower Po Basin

Abstract: Climate change, increasing demand for water, higher environmental standards and inelastic water supply suggest that future drought response in Southern Europe would require more efficient management of water use. In this context, there is a pressing need for a better understanding of the economic impacts of irrigation restrictions, including their microeconomic and broad economic repercussions. This paper connects a multi-attribute Revealed Preference Model working at an agricultural district level with a regi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the transaction costs of the reform measures, along with any abatement costs incurred by economic agents during the implementation of local adaptation strategies. Recent research focusing on the analysis of abatement costs in the PRB shows that the proportional rule used to reallocate water under the DSC approach-which relinquishes a fixed percentage of the initial allocation from users, irrespective of the economic losses involved-underperforms other formal drought management arrangements, such as water charges [54]. This gap will be further amplified via forward and backward linkages among economic sectors within the PRB, and with other Italian regions outside the basin.…”
Section: Transaction Costs and Policy Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the transaction costs of the reform measures, along with any abatement costs incurred by economic agents during the implementation of local adaptation strategies. Recent research focusing on the analysis of abatement costs in the PRB shows that the proportional rule used to reallocate water under the DSC approach-which relinquishes a fixed percentage of the initial allocation from users, irrespective of the economic losses involved-underperforms other formal drought management arrangements, such as water charges [54]. This gap will be further amplified via forward and backward linkages among economic sectors within the PRB, and with other Italian regions outside the basin.…”
Section: Transaction Costs and Policy Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some farmers experienced severe yield losses, agriculture as a whole found the drought beneficial in economic terms, while the majority of the burden was shifted onto final prices, i.e., consumers. According to [36] instead, irrigation constraints result in increasing incremental losses in agricultural areas of the lower Po River basin, which are further exacerbated by negative inter-sectoral feedbacks at the regional level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%