2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Impacts of the Generic Drug User Fee Act Fee Structure

Abstract: We conclude that the regressive nature of the GDUFA fee structure penalizes small, new, and foreign firms while benefiting the large established firms. A progressive fee structure in line with other human drug user fees is needed to ensure a healthy generic drug industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, Foreign Debt (X1) and Foreign Investment (PMA) variables significantly affect Economic Growth in Indonesia. The results of this study follow the third hypothesis, H3, which states that foreign debt (X1) and foreign investment (X2) have a positive effect on economic growth in Indonesia (Asian Development Bank, 2018;Dong et al, 2017) so that the third hypothesis is accepted.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Determination Valuesupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simultaneously, Foreign Debt (X1) and Foreign Investment (PMA) variables significantly affect Economic Growth in Indonesia. The results of this study follow the third hypothesis, H3, which states that foreign debt (X1) and foreign investment (X2) have a positive effect on economic growth in Indonesia (Asian Development Bank, 2018;Dong et al, 2017) so that the third hypothesis is accepted.…”
Section: Coefficient Of Determination Valuesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Recipients of foreign debt can be governments, companies or individuals. The form of debt can be in the form of money obtained from private banks, governments of other countries or international financial institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank (Dong et al, 2017;Temouri et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the analysis result can be seen that the value of P-Value 0.031 is smaller than 0.05, this means that H1 is accepted that the effectiveness of the system of information accounting impact positively on the performance of employees (Priliandani et al, 2020;Suardhika et al, 2012;Suardikha, 2013). Accounting Information System is a collection of information about finances are derived from the activities of collecting processing of transactions that relate to finance The system huh ng both regarded as fax tor important in the achievement of the performance, which is great especially in the process of making the decision (Bowrin, 2004;Dong et al, 2017). More and better quality of Accounting Information System which includes : easy to use, access that is fast, reliable, flexible , and secure to protect the data user then the system will feel satisfied (Chen et al, 2019;Sitawati et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also stated that there is a negative effect company size on capital structure. Research conducted stated managerial ownership has no effect on capital structure (Dong et al, 2017). Return on equity is the ability of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange to generate profits based on equity owned, which will be measured by comparing the net income with equity held by the company in the same period (Farimani & Yazdi, 2015;Kaplan & Norton, 1992;Trisnadewi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Multiple Linearmentioning
confidence: 99%