2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00453.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Inequality and Child Stunting in Bangladesh and Kenya: An Investigation of Six Hypotheses

Abstract: Consistent with the increasing focus on issues of equity in developing countries, I extend the literature analyzing the relationship between economic inequality and individual health to the developing world. Using survey data from Bangladesh and Kenya with economic status measured by a wealth index and with three different geographic definitions of community, I analyze six competing hypotheses for how economic inequality may be related to stunting among children younger than 5 years old. I find little support … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using data from repeated national surveys in 25 low- and middle-income countries, Restrepo-Méndez et al [37] have documented a general decline in the prevalence of stunting, accompanied in many cases by worsening equity at the national level. Another strand of literature has employed micro-data for a number of countries, including Bangladesh, to explore associations between under-five stunting and a wide variety of socio-economic and biological factors [15, 16, 26, 36]. Relatively under-researched is the question that links these two literatures: What factors are driving socioeconomic inequities in stunting and their trends?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data from repeated national surveys in 25 low- and middle-income countries, Restrepo-Méndez et al [37] have documented a general decline in the prevalence of stunting, accompanied in many cases by worsening equity at the national level. Another strand of literature has employed micro-data for a number of countries, including Bangladesh, to explore associations between under-five stunting and a wide variety of socio-economic and biological factors [15, 16, 26, 36]. Relatively under-researched is the question that links these two literatures: What factors are driving socioeconomic inequities in stunting and their trends?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another work, we had also shown that there was a significant socioeconomic inequality in childhood stunting in Ethiopia [16]. Studies done in Iran [17], Bangladesh [14, 18], and Kenya [18] also reported pro-poor socioeconomic inequalities in various forms of malnutrition among under-5 children. We found maternal education to be contributing the greatest proportion of the inequality in anemia between the rich and the poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…[23] Another study utilizing the Gini coefficient as a measure of inequality in Ecuador found inequality to have a significant, adverse effect on stunting, but only at the provincial scale. [11] In contrast, Gary Reinbold [24] found the Gini coefficient as a measure of economic inequality to be a non-significant predictor of individual health, instead finding the difference between individual household wealth and mean community household wealth to be the most important predictor of stunting, with the odds of stunting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%