Economic inequality and poverty: where do we go from here?

Abstract

Purpose-The paper aims to compare applied social policy approaches to child poverty and economic inequality, the latter being mainly operationalised in the UK in terms of social mobility. Design/methodology/approach-The paper considers the theoretical stance underpinning New Labour's approach towards social policy, with particular reference to ''individualisation'', and reviews Government strategies towards tackling poverty and economic inequality. Findings-Despite a decade of unprecedented investment, there is an impasse in reducing child poverty and economic inequality has increased. Policy now relies on education as being the clinching factor to break this impasse. Education is vital but education alone will not tip the balance in eradicating poverty. The assumption that education will facilitate social mobility, by serving to position the UK at the high end of the global labour market, fails to address the prevalence of the ''low-pay-no-pay'' cycle associated with the flexible labour market. Further measures are necessary to ensure that the labour market accommodates the needs of those entering it. Originality/value-The paper shows that, given the failure of current social policy to address poverty and inequality, especially given that post-recession conditions are likely to be less favourable than in the last decade, there is an urgent need for bold, new policy thinking. Pinning all hopes on education-and seeing solutions only in terms of individuals' skills and aspirations, without critical consideration of the nature of the labour market-cannot be accepted as the best way forward.

Social withdrawal as invisible youth disengagement

“…Such a notion of youth non-engagement or disengagement has emphasized more the quantity side of the picture, that is, minimization of the number of NEY and maximization of the number of engaged youth. If the quality side really matters, employment sustainability issues, such as jobs without training and workplace participation (Lawy et al, 2010;Gronkvist and Largerlot, 2009), work engagement (Taipale et al, 2011), vicious cycle of "low pay, no pay" of youth IJSSP 32,7/8 transitions (MacDonald and Marsh, 2009;Smith, 2010), and measures taken to keep young people in employment with job retention and advancement schemes (MacDonald, 2008), and critique on normative ideas underpinning welfare and activation measures for young people (Wong and Chiu, 2005;Yu, 2008), would surely be taken into consideration.…”

The Influence of Microfinance Institutions as Catalyst for Improved Performance of Small Scale Enterprises in Nigeria

“…The operation of Microfinance can only thrive if the repayment schedule is met promptly by the customers. Empirical studies have shown that loan repayment is determined by the quality of the beneficiaries and other factors like education, distance of the lender to the customer's business, amount of loan, duration of the loan, gender and sanction threat to the borrowers (Roslan & Abd Karim, 2009;N. Smith, 2010;Tang, 2002).…”

The Role of Microfinance in Poverty Alleviation: Empirical Evidence from South-West Nigeria

“…The operation of Microfinance can only thrive if the repayment schedule is met promptly by the customers. Empirical studies have shown that loan repayment is determined by the quality of the beneficiaries and other factors like education, distance of the lender to the customer's business, amount of loan, duration of the loan, gender and sanction threat to the borrowers (Roslan & Abd Karim, 2009;Smith, 2010;Tang & Bhatt, 2002).…”