Acknowledgements: This paper emerged from our collective participation in the ESRC Priority Network on Social Contexts and Responses to Risk (SCARR). The original idea to write a collaborative paper on framing comparing data and interpretations across the three projects came from Sophie Sarre, who also orchestrated the paper. The research reported here and preparation of the article was

No abstract

Purpose-The paper aims to compare applied social policy approaches to child poverty and economic inequality, the latter being mainly operationalised in the UK in terms of social mobility. Design/methodology/approach-The paper considers the theoretical stance underpinning New Labour's approach towards social policy, with particular reference to ''individualisation'', and reviews Government strategies towards tackling poverty and economic inequality. Findings-Despite a decade of unprecedented investment, there is an impasse in reducing child poverty and economic inequality has increased. Policy now relies on education as being the clinching factor to break this impasse. Education is vital but education alone will not tip the balance in eradicating poverty. The assumption that education will facilitate social mobility, by serving to position the UK at the high end of the global labour market, fails to address the prevalence of the ''low-pay-no-pay'' cycle associated with the flexible labour market. Further measures are necessary to ensure that the labour market accommodates the needs of those entering it. Originality/value-The paper shows that, given the failure of current social policy to address poverty and inequality, especially given that post-recession conditions are likely to be less favourable than in the last decade, there is an urgent need for bold, new policy thinking. Pinning all hopes on education-and seeing solutions only in terms of individuals' skills and aspirations, without critical consideration of the nature of the labour market-cannot be accepted as the best way forward.

No abstract