2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic performance and incumbents' support in Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although less marked, we also find a high correlation with the six-month moving average of the inflation rate (0.55) (Kenski 1977). Although this is a simple correlation, and we are not modeling presidential approval, these data are consistent with previous research in Latin America (Stokes 1996; Lewis-Beck and Ratto 2013; Carlin, Love and Martínez-Gallardo 2015; Murillo and Visconti 2017;Carlin et al 2018). Feb Negative image Macri administration Monthly inflation t-1 (secondary axis)…”
Section: The Economic Backdropsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although less marked, we also find a high correlation with the six-month moving average of the inflation rate (0.55) (Kenski 1977). Although this is a simple correlation, and we are not modeling presidential approval, these data are consistent with previous research in Latin America (Stokes 1996; Lewis-Beck and Ratto 2013; Carlin, Love and Martínez-Gallardo 2015; Murillo and Visconti 2017;Carlin et al 2018). Feb Negative image Macri administration Monthly inflation t-1 (secondary axis)…”
Section: The Economic Backdropsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These articles contribute to a growing literature on the dynamics of approval in presidential systems (e.g., Arce and Carrión, 2010;Carlin, Carreras and Love, forthcoming;Cuzán and Bundrick, 1997;Carlin, Hartlyn and Martínez-Gallardo, 2012;Johnson and Schwindt-Bayer 2009;Pérez-Liñán, 2007) by highlighting a set of factors that explain why some presidents deviate from the typical cyclical pattern. In line with previous research on economic voting in Latin America (e.g., Boelhouwer Menezes, 2018;Benton, 2005;Cabezas, 2015;Cabezas and Navia, 2010;Echegaray, 2005;Gélineau, 2007;Johnson and Schwindt-Bayer, 2009;Lewis-Beck and Ratto, 2013;Love and Windsor, 2018;Luna, 2002;Menezes, 2018;Murillo and Visconti, 2017;Singer, 2013Singer, , 2015Singer and Carlin, 2013;Visconti, 2017), all of the authors in this special issue agree that economic outputs -and economic perceptions of performance-go a long way in explaining patterns of executive approval. Also in line with previous work (Powell and Whitten, 1993), some of the articles find that institutions can alter patterns of approval.…”
Section: Case Studies Of Outliers Of Presidential Approvalsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Sociodemographic variables also have been shown to exhibit explanatory power, such as Gender (Morgan, ), Education , and Income (Zechmeister & Zizumbo‐Colunga, ; Layton & Smith, ; Handlin, ; Mainwaring, Torcal, & Somma, ; see also Murillo & Visconti, ) . We have no clear expectation because the direction of these control variables would depend on the political platform of the incumbent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%